pheloniusfriar: (Default)
This was written for a 4th year interdisciplinary Technology and Society class called “Forecasting”. As in predicting the future... what's not to love? From the syllabus: “This course will examine how we engage the future against a background of technological, societal and environmental change. We will do this by looking at forecasting and foresight techniques, and especially by considering science fiction: how it anticipates the future and how it changes the present.” One of the things we spent a fair amount of time on was Augmented Reality (AR) and Mixed Reality (MR), and when we were assigned to do a book report (on a book of fiction) that explored one or more of the subjects we covered, I went with AR since I had worked on AR-related stuff in the early 2000s as part of a tech startup (we didn't get the seed funding we were looking for because it was during the dot com bubble burst and nobody wanted to put any money into high tech, but that's another story). Anyway, if it wasn't clear, here there be spoilers yarrr, so proceed at your own peril if you ever intent to read this, or his related, books. As a further note, the structure was specified and is a little odd, but here we go.

Tombstone:
  • The book chosen: “Daemon” by Daniel Suarez. Published by Signet 2010, an imprint of New American Library, a division of Penguin Group (USA) Inc. Previously published in a Dutton edition, 2009. It was originally self-published by his own company, Verdugo Press, in 2006 under the author name Leinad Zeraus (his name spelled backward).
  • I did a number of Google searches for lists of books that contained mixed reality or augmented reality. The search that worked for me was “science fiction novels augmented reality”. I found a number of lists or mentions of specific books this way. Two books I saw on several lists or posts were the book by Suarez I chose, and Vernor Vinge’s “Rainbow’s End” (e.g. “What are the best novels about augmented reality?”, “Books About Video Games and Virtual Reality”). I made a list with a few other book titles and headed off to the Chapter’s at South Keys. The only book they had on that list was “Daemon”, so that is how the book was chosen: a combination of research, capitalist market forces, and luck.
  • Daniel Suarez received a B.A. in English Literature from the University of Delaware, but taught himself how to program and went on to become an information technology professional and systems consultant who worked for Fortune 1000 companies on “mission-critical software for the defense, finance, and entertainment industries”. He has been a speaker at TED Global, the MIT Media Lab, NASA Ames Center, the Long Now Foundation, and for various corporations. He is an avid PC and console gamer, and always loved creative writing and other creative endeavours such as running tabletop fantasy role-playing games. He has published four novels to date, all on ideas around technology-driven change, and his first, “Daemon” (originally self-published) became a New York Times bestseller. He lives in Los Angeles, California.
Outline:

The books has 45 chapters (617 pages), each of which is named, and is divided into three parts: Part One, Part Two: Eight Months Later, and Part Three: Six Months later. Thus, the events of the book take place within the span of under two years. Some chapters begin with a “news report” to provide relevant information in a condensed form needed to understand the story, most do not. Note: IVR is Interactive Voice Response (a prompt is played and speaker-independent voice recognition is used to determine which of a very limited number of voice responses is spoken). Also note: since it is a 45 chapter book, it was not possible to fit even brief chapter summaries into two pages.

The chapter-by-chapter spoilers are here... )

Point Of The Book:


The book seemingly had four primary purposes: to be a mainstream action-filled thriller for the thinking man, to promote and further valourize dominant misogynous alpha-hacker discourses, to explore the possibilities of multi-tier augmented reality systems, and to expound a philosophy that humans are not capable of effectively managing human culture. The story happens in our “today world” and as presented, it could even have happened in the past and we haven’t noticed yet.

As a thriller with technological content, every time a necessary computer or networking term is introduced, some ill-informed cop (or equivalent) stops the conversation and demands that the term be explained in very simple ways. The dialogue in the book is generally terrible, but they are mostly contained and the reader is rewarded with more scenes of violence or people of action doing action things. Some of the action scenes were real page-turners, and the book did make the New York Times bestseller list, so it obviously succeeded at this aspect of its purpose.

Infantile men looking to have their terrible opinion of women and fantasies of masculinity validated through fictional representations that support this world view would love the book for this. As is likely evident from my tone, I think this aspect of the book is highly problematic. Again, this likely had something to do with its rise to the bestseller list, but from the perspective of helping to move us into the future, it fails. Particularly considering the philosophies presented, this book would be a case in point for how human society is failing itself.

In terms of exploring the power of augmented reality and human/machine interaction, this book succeeds in a dramatic and creative way. The problem is that this part of the book is very near the end, and really only occurs in two chapters (one where it is demonstrated, and another where it is explained). For all that the writing was overall terrible from both a technical and attitude perspective, the book was worth reading for the ideas this small section contained. The augmentation took many forms, from simple voice and smartphone instructions, “go here, do that, say this”, through to full augmented reality headsets that allowed the wearer to operate in a game layer overlaid 1:1 on reality. When participants completed tasks, they were rewarded with points that confer upon them rank and material gain in the real world. The Daemon implemented a fully distributed human-powered manufacturing industry, “give this part to this person, that person assembles two parts and passes it on, etc.”, and uses such operatives to extend its power and reach into the physical world using humans as its effectors. The idea of integrating system-purpose (machine goals), human flexibility, and loosely coupled (and possibly locally unreliable) distributed algorithms is a powerful paradigm.

Lastly, in terms of philosophy, it is spelled out in the book: “Mammals of every species indulge in play. Games are Nature’s way of preparing us to face difficult realities. [...] Civilization is about to fail. [...] The modern world is a highly efficient, precision machine. But that’s its flaw – one wrench in the works and it all grinds to a halt. So what does our generation get? A culture of lies to hide weakness. Decreasing freedom. All to conceal one simple fact: the assumptions upon which our civilization is based are no longer valid. If you doubt me, ask yourself: why was I able to accomplish this? [...] But what if we corrected civilization’s weakness – as painful as that correction might be?” Here, is another part of the mythos that is being supported: that society is in chaos and we need heroes with grand visions to save it (and a male techno genius is “just the person to do it”).

Pretty much everything in the book from an ideological point of view is a rehash of a well-worn hero myth amongst bit-heads and hackers, but the creative use of AR to redesign the way human systems could be made to function is still a very clever notion.

Connection to this Course:

The characters in this book are hegemonically masculine – even the one woman portrayed as having agency (the rest are there simply to prop up another character’s performance of “male”) – and thus operate with a nearly pure Dominant Western Worldview (DWW). It is notable that there are no non-Western/non-white individuals in the entire story (with the exception of a bartender that behaves Western in every way), and the few non-white characters display hegemonic whiteness in their actions. In fact, if they weren’t labelled by the author as being non-white, there would be no way to tell by their behaviour. Again, this supports the DWW of the characters and the author himself.

The main human characters of the story are the dead game developer and hacker Matthew Sobol, police detective Pete Sebeck, government agent and hacker Natalie Philips, foreign actor and hacker Jon Ross, TV reporter Anji Anderson, criminal and hacker Brian Gragg, former soldier and now FBI Hostage Rescue Team member Roy “Tripwire” Merritt, and mysterious man of power “The Major”. All of these characters act as though they truly are the masters of their own destiny, and everyone and everything around them is there to facilitate this self-actualization. Their goals are universally to assert their will upon their personal domains. Sebeck and Merritt are the only two characters that seem content to only control a small part of the world, while the rest know no boundaries in their goals of achieving power and recognition. At no point are any resource limitations discussed, and thus the only determinant of potential is ambition. Finally, all of the characters believe and act as though every problem they face has a solution, if only they can be clever and persistent enough to find out how to assert control. Sebeck, when he is framed by the Daemon, convicted, and sentenced to death, is put in a position where his problem does not have a solution that he can see, and thus it becomes an unfairness and a tragedy. Meanwhile Philips and Ross are doing everything they can to save him and continue the narrative that the program can be solved. They are ultimately frustrated in their efforts, but it is indicative of the Daemon’s power being greater than theirs, and thus it is able to achieve domination when they cannot. It’s one big pissing match and all of it told from a variety of privileged white male Western positionalities (again, even the “black woman” behaves like a white Western male of considerable power).

Much of the tension of the book is in the programmed behaviour of the Daemon as it seems to be operating in a Human Exceptionalism Paradigm (HEP). There is no indication that Sobol operated in in anything but a DWW manner, but he obviously had philosophical or ideological notions that were expressed through his creation of the Daemon. Like Dr. Frankenstein, Sobol seems to be a profoundly flawed individual, and the monstrosity of his creation is similarly an inevitable product of its origins and manner of construction. The Daemon was based on a series of MMORPGs written by Sobol. In a game environment, there is a lack of challenge if a DWW is assumed for player characters – there is nothing to strive for. It has been shown in the book’s world that cooperation and shared challenges (or at least challenges that are experienced by all in common) motivate people to keep playing. In the game environment, there is no physics being – it is all social and cultural factors that govern how it unfolds as a group activity. The final stated goal of Sobol’s Daemon to overthrow current human society and replace it with one built around the technology it brings, explicitly supports the notion that progress will happen through technology whether humans are in control of said technology or not – that it is an inevitable and never-ending situation.

At the end of the book, Sobol (as a semi-interactive recording), stated that as the Daemon took control of the economy, those who had vested interests in the old, DWW, society took steps to protect themselves, their wealth, and thus their position of power and dominance. However, since the Daemon had become able to monitor nearly all transactions everywhere, it knew who was doing this and claims that “now they are more vulnerable than ever”. The recording of Sobol, on behalf of the Daemon goes on to say “My enemies will show themselves soon, Sargeant. As much as you despise me, they are your true enemy. I am merely an inevitable consequence of human progress.” Thus, progress is inevitable, and progress through technology is the way it happens. This machine-driven revolution will provide the solution to all of humanity’s current and foreseeable future problems. Games have been evolving to be more and more integrated with the mechanisms we have for reward, motivation, and avoidance; thus it is entirely plausible that the social structures we have created to maintain society through those neural pathways can be extended from the game world to the physical world – especially when mixed reality technologies increasingly blur that line.

At no point in the book is any mention made of a perspective that could be interpreted as New Ecological Paradigm (NEP).

Given the particular content of the book, the manner the story was structured, and the behaviour of the characters in it, and what was missing from the book, it seems plausible that the author has a Dominant Western Worldview themselves. However, like Sobol, the author seems to feel that DWWs are doomed to collapse, and violently at that.



Bonus video content... want to know what a future where AR/MR is ubiquitous could look like?

pheloniusfriar: (Default)
I have been ruminating on something said to me last week. Ruminating with tremendous effort, and it finally digested today. Unfortunately, the revelation comes too late, and was significant enough that I have gotten nearly none of the work done that I very much needed to do today because this took all my energy (doing research in peer reviewed journals to be sure). I posted about it on Twitter as it all came together, but that is hardly a useful means of communication... the post-it notes of the Internet (and I left Faceplant many, many years ago and remain very happy that I did). So I will try to put it here for posterity's sake to mark the moment in the pandemic where something I didn't understand became clear.

Firstly, I am now convinced I came down with COVID-19 symptoms Thursday, January 9, 2020. Yes, 2020. At the time, there was no testing in Canada, and antibody testing was not available for most of the year (even if I'd had the money) to check whether I'd had it or not. However, listening to more people talk about it, the symptoms that they experienced, and their path to recovery, that's exactly what I had. I would have been one of the first cases in Canada. I am reasonably convinced I gave it to my former intimate partner at the time as they had a whack o' symptoms of their own (not going into detail) and took them much of the year to recover from those symptoms (which were atypical for them, and definitely impacted them). I do not appear to have given it to my adult offspring (or if I did, they were entirely asymptomatic despite serious "pre-existing conditions", so I'm pretty sure I didn't). Remember, at that stage, we knew almost nothing about Sars-Cov-2 and had no inkling how big a deal it was.

I had last been in Geneva (at CERN) in November 2019, so I certainly didn't catch it then. However, I worked at Carleton University in the Department of Physics and people were going back and forth to China and Geneva all the time. Geneva is adjacent (physically and population-wise) to the full COVID-19 disaster that happened in Northern Italy (including Milan), and staff and visiting scientists at CERN went back and forth to those regions for family or leisure all the time. COVID-19 took hold and grew exponentially in that region. There is some suggestion that the virus was replicating before the first cases were formally identified, and it's possible it was brought back from there that early to Canada. It's also possible it was transmitted to me directly from someone who traveled to China and back over the 2019 university holidays (there were many faculty and students that did so). Regardless of where I got it, or from whom (I have my suspicions, but no proof... there were a lot of people sick around then), I definitely got it as we all headed back into work after the holiday break.

I have never been so sick, and certainly never that way, before in my life. I started feeling really unwell after work on Thursday, January 9, 2020 and by the next day, I was flat on my back. By Saturday afternoon, I thought my head was going to explode and everything else hurt like I was going to come apart at the seams. I'm incredibly pain tolerant, but I was sobbing uncontrollably and gasping for breath at how bad it was. I was within minutes of calling an ambulance, but my partner called their pharmacist about the symptoms and I think we called Ontario Telehealth (hard to remember) and I took some medications that seemed to pull me back from the brink. It took me a long time to recover, but I did without ever needing to be hospitalized. Once I was back on my feet, I didn't really think about it much, but I continued to not feel so great. I was tired and even more snarly than my usual irascible self, but I pushed through and went to my job and did my best with things at home, which weren't going great. As the pandemic set in proper, I became suspicious that perhaps I'd had and recovered from the virus. The written symptoms lined up, but all we read about were people who were dying or winding up in the ICU with massive damage to their body's systems... or those that were asymptomatic and quietly doing the virus' job. It wasn't until late 2020 that we started hearing rumours about "long COVID" or saw studies about serious harm done by the virus to people who were not necessarily even hospitalized. For most of the year, my thinking had been "well, if I had it, meh, I recovered and I've moved on... maybe I'll be resistant if I'm exposed again, cool".

I quit my job in August (this had been planned for a while) and started a master's degree in engineering (I'd wanted to do one in the social sciences, but was not accepted despite having graduated "With High Distinction" in that program, but that's another story... and I'd had enough of the physics department for a while, but still planned and plan to get a PhD in physics). Things blew up in my life in the May through July 2020 timeframe, and didn't really ease up at all until mid-October or so. I started classes in September though and was getting straight As in all my coursework, but things started crumbling and by mid-November, I had completely burned out and collapsed (metaphorically). I couldn't do any work and, as might be imagined, things didn't go very well for me. I won't go into details, but I'm still struggling to salvage any of that period of time (or at least not let it completely ruin my academic future). I went down to one class for this semester in hopes I could manage that, but I remained unable to focus clearly and was suffering serious anxiety any time I tried to sit and find the focus required to do school work. It made no sense to me, I love that kind of work, and I'm extremely competent at it (and the courses weren't that hard). It actually makes me feel good to do that exact sort of thing.

Last week I was talking with a counselor about my academic struggles, and mentioned in passing I'd likely had COVID in 2020. I did suffer emotional trauma last year and had put the blame on that for much in the way of the problems I was having. I've made it through much worse trauma before, and I'd always managed to find a path through to recovery, all the while continuing to function at a sufficient level to be able to muddle my way through the things I was trying to accomplish — or at least those things I needed to do to keep it all from falling apart. I'm a pro at muddling through. I'm a fucking star at finding a way no matter what. I'm smart and resourceful and resilient. Except. Except this time, it wasn't working. No matter how hard I tried, or what I did, I couldn't find a muddling strategy, I couldn't work through my trauma, I couldn't find a path, and I was functioning at the barest minimum level to make it day to day. This was not like me. This was not like any experience I've had before. I've thrived in much worse situations than this... I'm sufficiently full of piss and vinegar that I'll use a shitty situation as motivation rather than let it defeat me. But there I was, struggling for the barest minimum of operationality and stressed out of my gourd that nothing I tried made any difference in moving past it.

And that conversation I'd had with my academic counselor sat in my mind, and my subconscious chewed on it until it was finally digestible today. The counselor put two plus two together and got four, when I kept getting 3 or 27 or something. I wasn't thinking right. They said (to paraphrase): "if functionality you once had is gone, perhaps it was really lost, and perhaps there is a reason... there are studies that have shown that people who have had COVID sometimes have neurological issues that last long after the virus has been defeated, and those symptoms are often similar to those experienced by people who have suffered concussions." It didn't make much of an impression on me at the time (I agreed, and moved on), but holy shit it made an impression on me today. It explains so much of the past year, and everything I've gone through since! If my head feeling like it was going to explode was the brain swelling that has been observed in so many people who came down with COVID, and my head literally was exploding, then I very possibly suffered a traumatic brain injury right there and then on that day (with the day before leading up to it... it started before Saturday). I may have had the equivalent of a severe concussion due to COVID-induced encephalitis, and I've been recovering from it ever since (it takes about two years to fully recover from a concussion if it's not re-concussed, for example). I am doing much better now than even a couple of weeks ago, but I've remained crippled by having to come to grips with all of the unexplainable failures I'd experienced in so many areas (and a fear that I'd lost the ability to recover from any of it). The brain fog was lifting, but I didn't much like the landscape that was coming into view.

Things were going to shit last year (with or without COVID), and I was going to have a rough time of it no matter what; but if I had suffered a brain injury, it goes a long way to explain why things went worse than they probably should have. Bad and stressful things happened, but my reaction to them seems to have been amplified, and my coping skills were nonexistent, and all of that resulted in my reacting more negatively than I should have, or would have before. The impact of the emotional and mental stress I was put under was outsized, and it utterly disabled me rather than just kicking my 'nads up around my ears like such things usually did (which hurt, but could be recovered from once they were lowered back down and applied with a bag of frozen peas... all metaphorically speaking, of course). None of the issues got resolved (nor apparently could they have been under the circumstances with the physical impairment I seem to have been up against), and everything just kept building and building and I had no coping skills to bring to bear (because they had been hobbled), and eventually everything blew up. My reactions continued to me mired in a fog of incohesion but still amplified in misdirected ways through the lens of the injury I had suffered. Again, the symptoms I had (and to a lesser extent still have somewhat, but it's getting better) align completely with having had a damned brain injury.

My school (I am still trying to save it) and my relationship of ten years (they moved to the other side of the continent in July 2020, and we continued to keep in touch until things blew up in early March, so that's kaput) didn't survive the ordeal, and I feel like complete crap, but being able to put it all in context starting today is probably the piece I needed to understand what had happened, and what I need to do to heal physically, emotionally, mentally, and spiritually. There's a definitely long path ahead of me, but I can at least start to re-assess everything that's gone on, and maybe now can finally plot an effective and at least partially optimized path back to full functionality (and maybe a little more contentment).
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
I am digging through boxes upon boxes upon boxes looking for where I put my stupid birth certificate (which I need for some paperwork). I had taken it out of my wallet in 2019 because I was traveling overseas and figured that carrying my passport and birth certificate was probably a security risk (doing so domestically was as well, probably more so), and I put it somewhere safe. It's in the house, but it might as well be on Ceres. As I dig through boxes, I am uncovering some essays that I wrote but never posted.

The second one was written for a 4th year Women's and Gender Studies class (which was actually an English course... so... much... reading...) called "Women Travel Writers" with Dr. Roseann O'Reilly Runte. This was an amazing class done in a proper interactive seminar style. My classmates were all top knotch, and the discussions were always challenging and engaging. In addition, given her rank and position, Dr. Runte brought in some pretty amazing guests to the class. For instance, we got to talk to Charlotte Gray, the author of “Sisters in the Wilderness, The Lives of Susanna Moodie and Catharine Parr Traill” (fyi, I was studying Parr Traill for a gallery exhibit I was co-curating). There was an archives specialist who presented work done by Emily Carr. We had an amazing informal chat with Dr. Sharon Johnston (the then "wife of the Governor General") who was all forms of kick-ass and talked about her grandmother who was the inspiration for her novel "Matrons and Madams". And, I got to meet Roberta freakin' Bondar and hear the story of how she got to be an astronaut and then went on to become a professional nature photographer! Anyway, it was a great course, and the essay I had to write was on, gasp, women travel writers. Because one of the books we read in class, Jan Morris' "Last Letters from Hav", was fictional (but written like traditional travel literature), I felt I had permission to similarly use fictional travel writing, and chose this book. I will always remember Elisabeth Vonarburg fondly for attempting to teach me some Simon and Garfunkel songs on guitar one night in the Con Suite at a convention in Montreal. This is an exceptionally good book as well that I have read more than once. I further bring in Ursula K. LeGuin's foundational book The Dispossessed.

Elisabeth Vonarburg’s Pragmatic Utopia: “In The Mothers’ Land”

As long as there are social issues, there will be room and a need for utopian discourses along with, of course, resonant dystopian visions. Both literary genres explore the possible in order to encourage contemplation of the actual – whether through careful consideration by the reader, or by attempting to elicit a visceral response to the depictions they provide. But rather than just telling a story, “writers of utopian and dystopian fiction call for social and political action: in utopias, by describing a world in which we want to live, and in dystopias, by warning us of the consequences of current social and political trends” (Little). With our species’ new-found ability to destroy itself and potentially most life on Earth (or at least permanently cripple our collective ability to thrive), examinations of potentiality have assumed critical importance; and in our current age of postmodernist feminism, the literary and conceptual tools we can bring to bear on these questions offer a sophistication that is also unparalleled in history. To explore some key central contemporary themes and styles, I will examine categories of modern feminist utopian and dystopian stories, then focus on Quebec writer Élisabeth Vonarburg’s novel In The Mothers’ Land (originally Chronique du Pays des Mères, and later published as The Maerlande Chronicles), and discuss American Ursula K. LeGuin’s novel The Dispossessed.

The rest of the essay is here... )

Where utopian and dystopian stories have a long and venerable history, they have been criticized for being prescriptive and unrealistic. Modern entries into that genre, such as the works examined here, have managed to escape from the limitations and lack of subtlety that characterized so many earlier works. Strong use of allegory and postmodern feminist writing techniques (early postmodernism for The Dispossessed and late postmodernism for In The Mother’s Land) make these works fully critical analyses of society and social structures. These authors are not afraid to problematize their utopias – they do not fear the imperfection of their visions. On the contrary, “what differentiated these new utopias was their attempt to evade the traditional criticisms of the old utopias [...]: that they were static, boring, and unattainable. After all, utopias are not required, by definition, to be perfect. There seemed no reason to believe that all of humanity's problems could be solved through improved social organization; but it seemed possible that some of them might be” (Brians). The novel The Dispossessed was ultimately subtitled “An Ambiguous Utopia” in later editions and built on (and revolutionized) the traditions of American science fiction, tropes of individual exceptionality, and of the travelogue. LeGuin also claims that she was inspired by the anarchist writings of Murray Bookchin (Davis and Stillman), in particular Post-Scarcity Anarchism (Bookchin), in her portrayal of Anarres. Vonarburg is obviously influenced by the same American literatures (including, presumably, LeGuin), but could also draw from the traditions of French experimental and utopian fiction – for example, Hélène Sixous, Madeleine Gagnon, Nicole Brossard, and Jeanne Hyvrard (Santoro). With the tools of ambivalence and ambiguity at their disposal, both authors were able to create believable societies where better ways could be imagined, but could remain solidly grounded in the humanity of their visions. As readers, it is easier to travel along with a writer, and weigh the merits of their interpretations and stories, if the suspension of disbelief we must employ to follow them does not become the dominant tool that we need. In that regard both The Dispossessed and In The Mother’s Land succeed in a way every bit as engaging as the long tradition of non-fiction works by women travel writers.

And the bibliography is here... )
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
This is a short weekly assignment I did for a 4th year TSES class titled "Technology and Society: Forecasting"... a subject I have been interested in my entire life (as a lifelong reader of science fiction and speculative fiction, and as a scientist and technology architect). It is in two parts: the first was to answer a series of questions related to Dunlap and Van Liere's New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) Scale, and the second was to comment on the convincing dystopic vision of an augmented reality future in the short (6 minute) film "Hyper-Reality" by Keiichi Matsuda (link below). I apparently could not help myself in critiquing the questions posed (shown in italics).

-----------------

On Dunlap and Van Liere's New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) Scale. You should have one answer for each question. Possible answers for each question: 1 SA (Strongly Agree) 2 MA (Mildly Agree) 3 MD (Mildly Disagree) 4 SD (Strongly Disagree). If you can't decide between two answers, choose the one that is closest to your opinion.

1. We are approaching the limit of the number of people the earth can support. MA
... with the caveat that I strongly believe we have long ago surpassed that number.

2. Humans have the right to modify the natural environment to suit their needs. MA
... this is a vague question that lacks scope: I moderately agree that some minimal portion of the natural environment can be modified to suit our needs (many animals, plants, and microbes certainly do this), but not all of the natural environment as we are doing, and not disruptively as we are doing.

3. When humans interfere with nature it often produces disastrous consequences. SA
... interfere in what way? This could mean a lot of things, but I am assuming it means to modify major portions of natural systems when I answer strongly agree.

4. Human ingenuity will insure that we do NOT make the earth unlivable. SD

5. Humans are severely abusing the environment. SA

6. The earth has plenty of natural resources if we just learn how to develop them. MD
... long term sustainability is possible, but radical and fundamental (and likely unwelcome or impossible) changes in human society would be required. It has plenty if human needs are rescaled to match availability. Conversely, if the question is asking whether we can survive by being more aggressive about “developing” natural resources, then I would strongly disagree.

7. Plants and animals have as much right as humans to exist. SA
... kind of a silly question ... without plants and animals “existing”, there are no humans.

8. The balance of nature is strong enough to cope with the impacts of modern industrial nations. SD

9. Despite our special abilities humans are still subject to the laws of nature. SA

10. The so-called "ecological crisis” facing humankind has been greatly exaggerated. SD
... I crunch the numbers myself, we’re screwed.

11. The earth is like a spaceship with very limited resources. SA

12. Humans were meant to rule over the rest of nature. Hahaha, no. SD

13. The balance of nature is very delicate and easily upset. SD
... but we’re doing it anyway, way to go humans!

14. Humans will eventually learn enough about how nature works to be able to control it. SD
... when you consider Earth has an extinction-level event every 50 or 60 million years, there are factors in nature that will always be beyond our control (of course, we ARE the extinction event right now... and given that we are a part of nature, and we can’t control OURSELVES, then it’s easy to strongly disagree here).

15. If things continue on their present course, we will soon experience a major ecological catastrophe. SA

-----------------

Do you think that the short film "Hyper Reality" represents a plausible future? What are your reasons for this opinion? (a few sentences will do)

Yes, for so many reasons. Firstly, these sorts of technological capabilities are things I have been working with and toward for quite some time now, and have been working with one of the few Canadian pioneers of “virtualized experiential human interaction” from the 1990s on several projects. If it isn’t coming on its own (and I think it is), I am doing my little bit to advance the state of the art in the field. With respect to the vision presented, there were many aspects that I think are entirely plausible. Firstly, why would anyone agree to ubiquitous advertising? The answer is given, I think, in today’s web environment: you have to “pay for play”, and if you don’t subscribe to an ad-free experience, then you pay your way by allowing your eyeballs to be made available to advertisers in exchange for data usage and perhaps even the hardware. Given that the gap between the wealthy and everybody else (the purported 99%), without subsidizing their links/gear by allowing advertising or providing direct services to companies with personal information or even physical action, the vast majority of people will not be able to afford to fully plug in to the Mixed Reality that is inevitable. An excellent example is Uber teaming up with a sub-prime lender to give car loans to poor people in the US in return for driving for Uber to pay their cars (in markets that do not have enough Uber drivers to cover particular territories). As for the social (and commercial transaction) networking immersion/ubiquity presented and the gamification aspects as well, these are also inevitable as people continue to recognize that there is not enough meaningful work or even meaningful things to do for most people. Companies will prey upon this to tie people’s self-worth and what happiness they derive from how well they “play the game”. Human existence will become further abstracted from any reality grounded in our natural world and unless people are constantly bombarded by immersive media through as many senses as we can hook up, they will feel empty and lonely. The notion of a “life reset” as portrayed is quite plausible in this scenario, it would be one more service that people could tap into to survive in such a world. I could go on... Did I mention we are working as best we can to make sure the technology and paradigms we develop are disruptive to the likely future presented in “Hyper Reality”? Wish us luck, we need it...

pheloniusfriar: (Default)
I am digging through boxes upon boxes upon boxes looking for where I put my stupid birth certificate (which I need for some paperwork). I had taken it out of my wallet in 2019 because I was traveling overseas and figured that carrying my passport and birth certificate was probably a security risk (doing so domestically was as well, probably more so), and I put it somewhere safe. It's in the house, but it might as well be on Ceres. As I dig through boxes, I am uncovering some essays that I wrote but never posted.

The first one was written for a 4th year class in the "Technology, Society, Environment Studies" (TSES) department, an odd little department at Carleton University. The class was called "Information Technology and Society", which is a pretty cool and important topic (which is why I took it as an elective). It uses a case study of a Supreme Court of Canada decision as the foundation to ask questions about whether we have a reasonable expectation of privacy on the Internet, and manages to tie that to the notions of entropy, memetics, and the evolution of blue-green algae... go figure. The defendant, Spencer, had been arrested and charged with distributing child pornography. The Supreme Court decided that the police did violate his rights, but the crime had been committed and was sufficiently egregious that his appeal was dismissed (and he went to prison). It does bring up many questions about privacy as secrecy, as control, and as anonymity (the latter of which is least understood). I seem to remember I got a good mark on this essay.

Information Privacy and The Internet

On June 13, 2014 the Supreme Court of Canada, in the case of R. vs. Spencer, found that the constitutional rights of Matthew David Spencer had been violated when the police requested “pursuant to s. 7(3)(c.1)(ii) of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA)”1, and subsequently received “without prior judicial authorization”1, identifying information from his Internet Service Provider (ISP) based on his Internet Protocol (IP) address and the time window of his criminal usage of the Internet. Spencer was tried and convicted with evidence collected from his residence – with a proper warrant secured to actually enter and search the house, and seize his computer equipment – based on the police’s observations of his online activities and the identifying information received from the ISP that led them there. However, Spencer appealed the conviction stating that the technique used to locate him was a violation of his Section 8 Charter rights, which states that “everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure”2. The case ultimately went to the Supreme Court of Canada which ruled that, yes, his rights had been unwittingly violated by the police, but that due to the nature of his crimes, “the exclusion of the evidence rather than its admission would bring the administration of justice into disrepute”1, and his appeal was denied. While the search was ultimately deemed to have been illegal, the police “were acting by what they reasonably thought were lawful means to pursue an important law enforcement purpose”1 (in other words, they didn’t understand how PIPEDA worked), and Spencer would do his time.

The rest of the essay is here... )

The uneasy memetic to and fro between information seemingly “wanting” freedom, and the powerful drive to maintain control over it does not have a hegemonic solution, but rather will reach various states of dynamic equilibria over time. If one considers the memetic notion of info-freedom as a state, then this can be thought of as a “gaseous” phase of information; similarly, the meme of info-privacy can be conceptualized as information being in a “liquid” phase. In the former, information will expand to fill all the possible states available for it to be in and if new ideas (memes, information, data) is introduced into the system, it will over time diffuse through the entire infosphere. In the latter, information is still fluid, but it can be contained, controlled, measured, and distributed by those who manage its container. I humbly propose that what I have described comes complete with a fully-formed set of mathematical tools that could be used in the analysis of the flow of information from the “liquid” to the “gaseous” forms and back again: this field of study is called thermodynamics. Since information has already been framed using thermodynamic concepts (entropy), it seems natural to press the larger toolset available from that field into the study of how information will move towards a state where the flow of information between the “gaseous” and “liquid” states will be in balance – like a pool of liquid water in a vacuum at a certain temperature (where liquid water can still exist) will eventually stabilize into some amount of liquid and some amount of gas. As the pressure increases in the system, the equilibrium point will move toward more water and less gas; or as the temperature increases, that point will favour the gas phase. I would argue that we can consider the Internet (or broader infosphere) as the “box”, but one that is expanding exponentially (decreasing the gas pressure and favouring a gaseous state); but that the amount of information is also expanding exponentially (increasing the pressure and thus favouring a liquid state), and thus the equilibrium point is constantly moving and reacting to decisions we make regarding the extent of our global network infrastructure, privacy legislation, how much information is generated at what rate, and how accessible (from an interpretation standpoint) that information is, amongst other criteria.

Like any other ecosystem that humans participate in, we can and will shape it to suit whatever priorities we have at the time. In the end, if we consider the memetic perspective as accurate, neither absolute OCAP nor complete permissiveness will win, but rather a dynamic and ever-changing balance will be achieved between the two. The challenge we face then is, like trying to model the ecosystem of the Earth, to develop models we can use to analyze its dynamic behaviour, but to do so, we need to increase our understanding, though examinations like the R. vs. Spencer case, of what questions need to be asked.

And the bibliography is here... )
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
I will be Geneva (CERN) from Nov. 11 through Nov. 15, and then Oxford (with side trips to London) from Nov. 15 through Dec. 4 (flying out of London Dec. 5). DM me if you want to get together for tea or a pint :).

I will be in Geneva for the ATLAS experiment's fall Upgrade Week and then will be travelling to the UK to work mostly at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory to help test the new front-end readout ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) for the ITk inner tracker upgrade project (this version of the chip is supposed to be the one that is actually used in the detector, set for installation in 2025 or so — the chips I've been working with so far have been the earlier prototypes).

Listening to Ume as I continue to code, and code, and code... hardcore, but fresh and exciting, imo. Amazing how the lead singer/lead guitar player goes between harsh and soft. Listen to the whole Antiquiet session if you get a chance!

pheloniusfriar: (Default)
I just got back from the two weeks in Shanghai, China and realized that is the first actual vacation I have had in four years (when I went to a friend's cottage for four days). There is no wonder I've been so burned out. I had a great time and really liked the place: it is dynamic and vibrant, a broad mix of influences, and was culturally diverse (meaning many Asian cultures and some Western cultures). Taking ground transportation (maglev) that hit 430km/h was mind blowing given the rather pedestrian speeds available on any ground transportation I've ever taken in Canada. The banking and financial sophistication there — right down to the most basic transactions with street food vendors (btw, zomg yummy!) — was also so far advanced over anything I've experienced before. Don't even get me started on social media: there, it facilitates in-person experiences rather than insulating from it and has features I've also never seen on this side of that pond to faciliate real-world communities. On a separate note, on my first outing with locals for dinner, it was inevitable: they ordered a "soup with two eggs", which was one of their favourite dishes (each person ordered a dish to share at the table). One egg was egg drop in the soup and the other was, of course, a century egg. Gotta say I was hoping to make it through my trip without having to face one, much less having it served in such a social situation. The verdict: it actually tastes good, and the texture wasn't as sketchy as I thought it would be :-). I would definitely have it again in a dish, but I can also say that I'm not going to rush out and buy a dozen to start tossing in ramen at home ;-). Baby steps. Next up? Probably chicken feet.

On my last evening there, I gave a presentation on the amazing $4 CY8CKIT-049-42xx Cypress PSoC development kit at the Xinchejian hacker space weekly open house. I use it in a number of projects I've been working on, and it's an order of magnitude more complicated (at least) than the Arduino processors that are in wide use, so I thought it might be of interest (and they did too as they invited me after I pitched the idea to them). Despite some A/V technical issues, the talk went well and there were quite a number of questions during and after (talks were given in both Chinese and English). The dev kit is also available on Taobao in China for nearly the same price (¥29.00), which is good. Hopefully more on that later, but I need to try to sleep again as I am jet lagged as fuck and need to adjust my schedule back to Ottawa time as soon as I can (I tried to sleep earlier as I was crazy tired, but I couldn't drift off, thus this post). I can't wait to go back and do some deeper exploration (and with more Mandarin language skill than I went with this time, which was effectively zero, if not less... but everyone was quite patient and we made it work by pointing and smiling to each other, or with the aid of a translator on one of our phones). Lots of other great stuff happened while I was there, but I'm going to stop here for this post. So... time to finish the series...

These short biographical essays were written as part of a 4th year Women's and Gender Studies seminar class I took in the winter/spring of 2017 called “Representations of Women’s Scientific Contributions” with Dr. Cindy Stelmackowich at Carleton University. Each of the essays required deep research into difficult to find historical and contemporary info-fragments and sometimes oblique references in order to find a coherent and accurate narrative. They also needed to be short (always a challenge for me).

Born in 1896 along the Bay of Fundy, “as a child she sailed around the world with her [sea captain] father” and growing up “often played by the shoreline, studying the tiny creatures in the water – the beginnings of her interest in fossil invertebrates” (Monteith, 1993). She earned a B.A. in general arts from McGill in 1919. However, after finishing her B.A., a field trip to Manitoba with Alice Wilson, whom she met at McGill, inspired her to follow a career in geology (Sherriff & Reuter, 1994). She went on to get her M.A. from the University of Toronto (UofT) in 1923, in 1926 became “the first woman in Canada to get a Ph.D. in geology/paleontology”, and further was “the only woman [in Canada] to have an academic position during the interwar period” in that field (Ainley, Rayner-Canham, & Rayner-Canham, 2012). She served as Associate Director and then Curator of Invertebrate Palaeontology of the Royal Ontario Museum (ROM) from 1936 to 1957, professor of paleontology in the Department of Geology of the UofT from 1956 to 1967, and then as professor emeritus in the Department of Geology at the UofT and Research Associate in the Department of Invertebrate Palaeontology in the ROM until her death in 1990 (aged 94) (Monteith, 1993). Regarding her association with Alice Wilson, it is important to note that in 1938, for her work at the Geological Survey of Canada, Wilson became the first woman to be elected a fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. In 1942, for her prolific and influential work on invertebrate fossils and her prowess as a curator and administrator, Fritz became the second woman to receive that honour (Friedland, 2013).

Fritz’s relationship to her mentor at the UofT, William A. Parks, is mentioned in nearly every article on her career. It is telling that even in the mid-1920s, Parks was willing to share credit with her. For instance, a mid-1920s US government index of geological work contained the following reference: “Parks, William A. 1711. (assisted by Madeleine Fritz). The stratigraphy and paleontology of Toronto and vicinity; Part III, Gastropoda, Cephalopoda, and Vermes: Ontario Dept. Mines, 31st Ann. Rept., vol. 31, pt. 9, 45 pp., 5 pls., 1923.” (Loughlin & Mansfield, 1926). In 1971, she wrote a biography of Parks (Fritz & Museum, 1971) in which she indicated a number of notable individuals to whom he was instrumental in launching the careers of; however, she does not number herself in that list, although she acknowledges his role in her own bio at the end. While Parks facilitated her advanced studies – she was the only woman graduate student at the UofT in the 1920s – and worked with her at the ROM, she indicated that she operated in an overall atmosphere of acceptance and encouragement, and commented “that she felt accepted by the men and that no one tried to discourage her” (Ainley et al., 2012). At the same time though, “aware of the difficulties married women faced in academe [...] chose to remain single and pursue graduate studies” (Ainley et al., 2012).

During her career, she published more than 70 academic papers on samples that she both received and collected from the west of Canada (Fritz, Unknown) to the east (Fritz, 1966) and points in between (Fritz, 1957), and was responsible for the discovery and naming of several new species (see, e.g., (Fritz, 1941)) and the re-classification of others (Fritz & Royal Ontario Museum, 1981). Her impact on the field of invertebrate paleontology cannot be understated as “she achieved world renown for her scientific papers on fossil Bryozoa”, and “so many Fritz-educated professors have taught in paleontology departments of universities around the world that she has been called ‘the great-grandmother of Paleozoic Bryozoa’” (Monteith, 1993). Despite direct opposition by the Geological Survey of Canada to women participating in field work (Ainley et al., 2012), she continued to engage in such endeavours through much of her career while also working as a researcher, administrator, and teacher. “Her three-pronged professional path was unique in the history of Candian women and science, because men dominated such positions in geology/paleontology, in both university and museum settings. [Other successful women] followed the more usual path of ‘surrogate mother’ as dean or warden for women” (Ainley et al., 2012). Fritz’s professional ambitions, determination, and resourcefulness stand out to this day as exceptional during the times in which she flourished (Prentice, 1991), and while she perhaps sacrificed her personal life to be allowed to work, opened opportunties to many that followed.

And the very useful references are here... )
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
These short biographical essays were written as part of a 4th year Women's and Gender Studies seminar class I took in the winter/spring of 2017 called “Representations of Women’s Scientific Contributions” with Dr. Cindy Stelmackowich at Carleton University. Each of the essays required deep research into difficult to find historical and contemporary info-fragments and sometimes oblique references in order to find a coherent and accurate narrative. They also needed to be short (always a challenge for me, heh). Obviously, research into living scientists was a bit easier with the advent of the web (and Dr. Conlan is known by some in non-scientific circles from having been featured in magazines like Canadian Geographic and for her children’s books on her research, so there are popular sources as well).

Born in Ottawa, Ontario in 1950, Kathleen (Kathy) Conlan is an active Research Scientist at the Canadian Museum of Nature focused on antarctic and arctic marine benthic (bottom dwelling organism) ecology and amphipod systematics that, in addition to its pure research value, is a means of studying long term climate change, the effects of pollutants, and the impact of fisheries on marine life (Canadian Museum of Nature, 2015). She also studies the effects of ice scours (the scraping of the sea floor by moving icebergs and ice packs) on benthic life (Conlan & Kvitek, 2005), and the ecology of underwater canyons (Conlan, 2016). Her work is so influential that she has become synonymous with her field of research in the scientific community, for example “studies of sea-bed disturbance, especially the effects on crustacean communities of chemical toxins, are Kathy Conlan’s work” (Riffenburgh, 2007).

Conlan also engages in continual public outreach, education, and the popularization of her work through talks, direct engagement with students, museum exhibits, and public demonstrations, e.g. (Vancouver Aquarium, 2017), (Canadian Museum of Nature, 2010), (Racette, 2007), (Hill, 2003), and (Nguyen, 2015). She has also written a children’s book about her work called “Under The Ice” that has won at least 8 awards (Kids Can Press, 2017), including the prestigious Science in Society prize for a children’s book handed out by the Canadian Science Writers’ Association, since it was published in hardcover in 2002 (Conlan, 2002). In 2015, she was named one of Canada’s greatest explorers by Canadian Geographic (Canadian Geographic, 2015). In addition to her research, her infectious enthusiasm for her work and respect for the people who live in the arctic (Hill, 2003), has made her a welcome visitor and educator of young and old alike. Conlan states of her motivations for outreach and knowledge sharing, “the founding idea was that if youth knew about the Arctic and Antarctica they would protect and stand up for it against any exploitation that might occur in the future [...]. In essence, we were creating a bunch of ambassadors.” (science.ca, 2015).

While she grew up in Ottawa, it was a trip to the west coast when she was 16 that ignited the interest that led to her career, “I was really taken with the ocean and marine life at that point, and that trip really solidified my interest in going into biology” (science.ca, 2015). She got her B.Sc. (Honours) at Queen’s University in 1972, her M.Sc. in marine ecology at the University of Victoria in 1977, and her Ph.D. in systematics and evolution from Carleton University in 1988 (Canadian Museum of Nature, 2015) (CCAR, 2015). She has been Chief Officer (2008-present) and Secretary (2004-8), Life Sciences Scientific Standing Group for SCAR (Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research); Member, Canadian Committee for Antarctic Research (1998-present); Adjunct Professor, Department of Biology, Carleton University (2004-present); and Section Head, Life Sciences Program, Canadian Museum of Nature (2006-present) (Canadian Museum of Nature, 2015). While it is impossible to draw conclusions, it is notable that she was one of four women out of 14 members (28.6% women) of the Canadian Committee on Antarctic Research (CCAR) for 2014-15 (CCAR, 2015). The number does agree with with studies done at the time that shows that 22% of STEM professionals are women (Shendruk, 2015).

Conlan is all the more interesting in that this particular field of study is not necessarily attractive or even accessible to many due to cultural bias and socialization – in short, the “ick factor” of studying sea “bugs” (Hildebrand, 2005). Hildebrand writes that while on an unsuccessful mega-fauna (i.e. whale) spotting tourist trip aboard an arctic research vessel (with Conlan on board), a lack of whales to be spotted caused them to turn to whatever activity they could find on the ship. Their writing shows that Conlan’s passion is obvious as she studies the amphipods she has brought up from the sea floor as she exclaims, “look at this [...] here’s a female with a brood pouch of fifteen”, or “this one’s a male [...]. You can see he's holding a female under his thorax. They'll mate when the female molts. It's very exciting to watch!”. In stark contrast, Hildebrand felt that “there is nothing spiritual in these lives, nothing exultant; they are simply grist for larger animals” (Hildebrand, 2005). Such attitudes only serve to emphasize the importance of the work, both in research and outreach, that Conlan and scientists like her are doing – it is work that is crucial to understanding global ecosystems and our impact on them, yet is unglamourous in the eyes of the average person, with the exception of the breathtaking photographs of her diving under Antarctic ice.

And the very useful references are here... )
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
Zomg!

October 27, 2017

Phelonius Friar
Ottawa, ON

Dear Phelonius Friar:

I am pleased to inform you that the Senate of Carleton University, at its meeting of October 27, 2017 granted you the following degree:

Bachelor of Arts Honours
With High Distinction
Women's and Gender Studies

This degree will be conferred at the Convocation ceremony held on November 18, 2017 at 9:30 am. If you do not attend the convocation, diplomas will be made available for pick up at the Registrar's Office beginning November 21st for a period of 2 weeks.

On behalf of Carleton University, I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate you on this important achievement.

Yours sincerely,
Suzanne Blanchard
Vice-President (Students and Enrolment) and University Registrar

This email was generated from the Carleton University student information system. Please accept this as official documentation from the University.


I'm a little broken hearted that I can't walk the convocation stage as I will be in China from November 10 through the 23rd, that was insanely hard work to get and I'd have loved to get my thirty seconds of recognition :(. But... being in China as the reason why I'm missing it is at least a good reason.

pheloniusfriar: (Default)
These short biographical essays were written as part of a 4th year Women's and Gender Studies seminar class I took in the winter/spring of 2017 called “Representations of Women’s Scientific Contributions” with Dr. Cindy Stelmackowich at Carleton University. The work that we did in that class, and as volunteers over the following summer, led to the well-received exhibit “HERbarium” at the Carleton University Art Gallery (which will run until December 3, 2017). The exhibit looks at the groundbreaking work of global reach and implication by five Canadian women scientists. In the case of three of those women, their work remained virtually unknown outside of their specific scientific fields and utterly unknown to the broader public. The work done for “HERbarium” will be informing a much, much larger exhibit at the Canadian Museum of Nature in 2018 that is being curated by Dr. Stelmackowich. This essay was about one of the women whose work was included in the exhibit – the other two essays (to follow) examined the work of other women (not in the exhibit). Each of the essays required deep research into difficult to find historical fragments and sometimes oblique references in order to find a coherent and accurate narrative. They also needed to be short (always a challenge for me, heh).

As a further note, the abstract/proposal I submitted to Gender Summit 11 on the work we did on “HERbarium” and its value as historical and feminist research was accepted, and I will be presenting a poster (along with one of the other students that worked on the “HERbarium” exhibit) at the conference Nov. 6 through Nov. 8 in Montréal, Québec. At the conference “600 advocates of gender equality from science, innovation and development will participate. The overarching theme this year is
Embracing pluralism and thriving through diversity – shaping science and innovation. The Gender Summits are a series of interconnected, action-based events held across the globe since 2011. They follow the theme of Quality Research and Innovation through Equality. Their aim is to make gender equality in research and innovation the norm and to embed gender equality as a primary dimension of quality”. I am very excited to be participating in the first one held in North America!

Catharine Parr Traill (née Strickland) was born in London, England on January 9, 1802, the fifth daughter of Thomas Strickland (Morgan, 1903), manager of the Greenland Docks on the Thames, and Elizabeth Homer who went on to have another daughter and two sons together. Soon after her birth, her father retired from the docks and they moved a number of times to keep up with his various business interests, all the while receiving instruction from him “in such subjects as geography, history, and mathematics, all of which he oversaw; [while] his wife took charge of their development in the traditional feminine skills” (Peterman, 2003), which included dairy work and vegetable farming that would be valuable skills later in her life (Hobbs & Goddard, 2001). While living on a farm in Suffolk, “it was here that Catharine’s most vivid memories of childhood were formed. She recalled in particular fishing with her father [...] while being read to and reading from his copy of Izaak Walton’s The compleat angler. ‘The dear old Fisherman,’ as she told author William Kirby in 1895, had helped when she was a child ‘to form my love of Nature and of Natures God’” (Peterman, 2003). However, Thomas’ business interests increasingly kept him away from home and the Strickland children were left to find their own ways of occupying their time. In Catharine’s case, it was to work on the writing of stories to share with her siblings and family friends, and the collection of plants as her father had taught her to do.

Thomas died in 1818 and left the family in relative poverty when his business ventures failed, and Catharine turned to publishing her stories, starting at the age of 15, as a means of contributing to the family’s upkeep (Peterman, 2003). “She was the first of the sisters to commence writing, and it was the favour with which her stories and sketches were received by the public that led her elder sisters to enter the same field” (Morgan, 1903). Most of her early works were tales of Christian and Victorian morality intended for a young audience, e.g. (Strickland, 1822), (Strickland, 1823), (Strickland, 1825), and (Strickland, 1828); however, she did increasingly publish a books on her experiences as a naturalist, but still for a younger audience, e.g. (Strickland, 1930), (Strickland, 1831a), and (Strickland, 1831b).

In 1832, she married the Scottish widower Lieutenant Thomas Traill against the wishes of her family and they soon emigrated to Canada to escape financial hardship. In 1836, Catharine published her most famous work, “The Backwoods of Canada. Being Letters from the Wife of an Emigrant Officer, Illustrative of the Domestic Economy of British America” (Traill, 1836), written “using the kind of realistic detail that has become a tradition in Canadian literature” (Canada Post Corporation, 2003). While it details the hardships she faced attempting to settle in Canada, “it consistently measures Canadian experience through the lens of respectability, social class, and good taste, and in terms of interests congenial to women of similar background” and “to make clear the kinds of adjustment, effort, and resolve that were necessary if one was to adapt to Canada’s primitive and demanding circumstances” (Peterman, 2003). It was explicitly meant to be part of the colonial effort along with her subsequent books “all of which had a marked influence in promoting emigration to Canada”, including “‘The Canadian Crusoes’, ‘The Female Emigrant’s Guide’, ‘Rambles in the Canadian Forest’, ‘Studies in Plant Life in Canada’, ‘Pearls and Pebbles’, and ‘Cot and Cradle Stories’ (Morgan, 1903).

Her husband Thomas suffered ongoing financial hardships both in Canada and back in England, and continued to move Catharine and her seven children (two of their nine children had died in the 1840s) from place to place in Ontario looking for success. But the 1850s presented “an increasingly difficult struggle marked not only by deaths, illnesses, lack of firewood, and crop failures, but also by the incapacitating bouts of depression suffered by Thomas”, who ultimately died in 1859 leaving the family in destitution (Peterman, 2003). Catharine rarely complained in any of her writings or to her friends, but continued to write as a means of supporting herself and her family.

By 1861, Catharine had completed the manuscript for “a groundbreaking work on hundreds of local plants” but “despite commendations by professors, no Toronto firm was willing to risk publishing a long, specialized book” (Globe, 2015). To make the book more attractive to publishers, she enlisted the help of her niece Agnes FitzGibbon (née Moodie, daughter of her sister Susanna) to produce a set of illustrations to go in the book. Agnes, a trained artist, agreed in part because she had recently lost her own husband and was hoping it might provide a means of support for herself and her six children, found a potential publisher, taught herself lithography, and serially produced each of the ten plates on a single borrowed lithographer’s stone at a Toronto printer. The publisher, John Lovell of Montreal, agreed to publish the book, provided Catharine and Agnes found 500 subscribers to the book at $5 apiece “which at that time was enough to buy a substantial piece of furniture” (Globe, 2015). By June 1867, 400 subscribers had been recruited and the publication began of “Canadian Wild Flowers”. Agnes, her daughters, and several artists from a local Toronto art school, hand painted each of the 5000 illustrations for the book (10 colour plates in each times 500 copies of the book) and Catharine was given $50 for her part in writing the book (again, a substantial amount then). “Canadian Wild Flowers set the standard for sumptuous nineteenth-century Canadian books. An early example of large-format home-produced colour illustration, it was one of the first serious botanical works published in the country” (Globe, 2015). In 1894, biologist James Fletcher, who established the National Herbarium of Canada on the Central Experimental Farm, justly praised Traill’s plant descriptions, despite her classification as an amateur botanist, as “one of the greatest botanical triumphs which [anyone] could achieve” (Peterman, 2003).

Catharine died in 1899 at the age of 97 and was writing until the end, and “at her death she was said to be the oldest living authoress in the British Dominion” (Morgan, 1903). Despite all the hardships she experienced, she was fondly remembered: “John Reade, speaking of Mrs. Traill [...] says: ‘No one knew her who did not love her. Those who knew nothing of her literary fame, loved her for her Christian love and charity. All children loved her. It was not uncommon for grey-haired men and women to say: “I have known and loved her all my life.” Her one boast (if boast it could be called), was: “I have never lost a friend.”’” (Morgan, 1903).

And the very useful references are here... )

The following is a photo of the Catherine Parr Traill section of the “HERbarium” exhibit. The print at the top right is of an herbarium specimen, a Cinnamon Fern from the massive Vascular Plant Collection of the Canadian Museum of Nature, which was collected by Catherine in 1897 (when she was 94 years old) and showed that she was actively pursuing botanical research (it is properly preserved and labelled with its scientific name and collection place, etc.) until she died in 1899. Click on the photo to open the full sized image in another tab.

pheloniusfriar: (Default)
I realized how tired I was when I got to to the airport here and decided that my initial plan to take a bus tour of London was not such a good idea, and I wisely decided to head straight to Oxford. Took the Hogwarts Gatwick Express train to London's Victoria station, headed to the London Underground where I was disappointed to learn it was not a political movement (cues rimshot) and headed from Victoria Station to Paddington Station, and from there caught a train to Oxford. Definitely a good idea because I was having trouble keeping my eyes open by the time I got here. I pretty much caught all of my connections and it still took about 4 hours of travel... ugh.

The situation was not helped that in order to find where I was staying I needed to go to the Porter's Lodge at St. John's College in Oxford. This process was impeded by a complete and utter lack of any signage or guidance. I was reasonably sure I was close to it, but to find it I basically pushed open a massive fortress door (which was mysteriously unlocked, and which I saw people occasionally wander out of as I stood on the sidewalk trying to get my UK phone plan to works... note: that remains a work in progress) and wandered into an empty courtyard and meandered into another courtyard and randomly went into a doorway to another area where I saw an open door to something that looked like an office and went in... and there it was (there were a lot of other possibilities for where I could have gone, it was extremely lucky that I "zen navigated" my way to the right place... if nothing else, I would have asked anyone I found for help). I paid for my flat (in advance... thank goodness my Canadian bank card worked, it is supposed to work like Visa debit card and did) got the keys and fobs and set out to find the place, dragging my luggage behind me... it was walking distance, but further than I expected by a little bit. I got in (hauled everything up three flights of stairs). You walk in the door and there is a vestibule with a light switch and two doors leading off of it in opposite directions. In one direction is a living room with a chair, a small couch, a foldable dining table, wall shelving, a desk, a small cabinet, and what was a fireplace (now sealed up). Off the living room is another door that leads to a small kitchen with stove, small fridge, microwave, toaster, sink, cupboards above and below with plates, cookware, etc.. Going the other direction from the vestibule is the bedroom with a queen sized bed, bedside tables with lamps, and a little closet with an ironing board, iron, vacuum, etc.. From the bedroom is another door and a fairly large bathroom with toilet, sink, and shower. It is far from luxurious, but it is certainly more spacious than a hotel room (or hostel room, which is where I was originally supposed to be staying... there is a private hostel for visitors to the facilities in Harwell, but it was full so one of the physicists from Oxford was able to get me this flat I am in now).

It was late afternoon, and I went out for dinner. A lot of the places nearby that looked promising were actual British pubs, and by that I mean I could get beer, but not really anything in the way of food from what I could see (none of the customers had anything but pints). I ended up going to what looked like a chain restaurant (https://www.browns-restaurants.co.uk/) because they had what looked like decent food and had a menu out front. They were serving mid-afternoon tea with the trays of goodies and such, it was fun to see. Their regular menu was also available. I ordered what turned out to be a micro-brew IPA (my friend in China needs to come here and teach English... I can't understand a thing they're saying... seriously, and lol, they can't understand me one whit either!) that was very strong and bitter (I liked it, most people I know would not have) and their "Slow cooked salted pork belly" which was came with savoury apple pie, buttered green beans, mash, crackling, and red wine jus. It was better than I expected from a chain type restaurant (not a large chain, they have about two dozen locations, but still). They had a very European attitude toward bringing the bill (I had to flag my server down and make air-scribbling motions), but I was falling asleep at my table and had to get out. The good news again is that I was able to use my Canada Post prepaid Visa to pay for my meal (so that works too, which is good). I have some UK currency in my pocket, but my bank in Canada gave me 5 Pound notes that aren't accepted as currency here anymore, sigh, which is about 40% of the cash I had on me. I should be able to trade them in for valid UK currency, but will probably need some help with that because only banks will do it.

From there, I came back home (home is where I hang my hat) — via a convenience store where I bought vegetable samosas and an orange juice for a snack later — and pretty much fell asleep. I just got up am going to try to go back to sleep again soon (had a samosa, it was pretty good, and the juice) but will try to repair my shoe again with the glue I got (and brought), see if Virgin Mobile can fix the issue with my local phone plan in the UK which doesn't seem to be working, and maybe put my clothes away (and maybe even take a shower, which would be a public service at this point I'm sure).

If I wake up early enough, I might do the London hop on/hop off bus tour thing tomorrow but I'm not going to set an alarm. There is also the possibility of just doing a tour of Oxford (they have open topped double decker buses and lots to see here as well, it's quite the tourist town). I also need to figure out where to catch the private shuttle bus from Oxford to the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Monday morning (I need to be there by 9:30AM, which seems quite civilized). Two shuttle tickets were waiting for me at the Porter's Lodge that had been sent by mail by my contact. The address was "Phelonius Friar, c/o The College Porter, St. John's College, St. Giles, Oxford, OX1 3JP"... seriously, this place has no actual address... you either know where it is, or you don't! Fyi, I found a little medieval door to the street (short, and studded with iron things) that is the door the area where the Porter lurks, err works that I can go to in the future if I need to. It allows access to one of the courtyards I had wandered through earlier, and has a doorbell that will summon the porter 24/7 from what I was told. It is unlocked, I was also told, until 11PM. There is absolutely no indication on or anywhere near that door or the buzzer as to what might lie behind it or what it's purpose is. I am thinking I will have to leave quite early for the shuttle bus as well... they indicate a location, but I suspect it is also a "you know where it is or you don't" sort of thing... and I don't ;).

I imagine that this is the sort of thing that goes on inside these mysterious institutions in Oxford:



EDIT: Well, because of some sort of massive failure at Carleton University, I have been without an Internet connection for several days (I was using Eduroam, which was working perfectly, but because it authenticates at the user's home institution, and mine was a flaming dumpster fire, I could not get access). No biggie, but it did mean that I could not update here. I wanted to update in specific to this post though... I went back to Brown's for Sunday dinner as I was very tired and it sounded nice. It was very disappointing instead, and quite expensive. Most concerning is that I decided I would go out for dinner again tonight and went back to Brown's and had one of the three worst meals of my life (and I have eaten in a lot of places around the world). I am never going back, and would have to recommend that if anyone else gets the chance to eat there that they consider my warning. I will have an update shortly on my trip.
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
I also just found out today (after the previous good news email already reported on) that I will be issued with a work visa for the UK "by way of ancestry" (my grandfather was British and moved to Canada after the war, and Canada is still a Commonwealth country). It's a 5 year multi-entry visa with quite liberal requirements for working in the UK (as long as I can support myself for a reasonable period of time, I can even go to look for work rather than having to have a job in hand at the border). My employer, Carleton University here in Canada, is going to pay for my travel, lodgings, and other expenses while I'm there (along with my salary, of course), so I will just be shifting money to the local economies in the area in return for hands-on experience. It is going to be used over the next few years (presumably) to spend a few weeks at a time at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (RAL) near Oxford (in Oxfordshire) to work on the Phase II upgrades to the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN due to be installed in 2025 (at which point it will become the HL-LHC or High Luminosity LHC). Heady times! I'll be staying in a flat for visiting scientists at St. John's College at Oxford and I'm already crazy excited at just the prospect of that (I'm easily contented apparently)! It also looks like I will have a couple of days in Oxford or London to do a bit of touristy type stuff... now I just have to figure out what to do with that time... hmmmm. I'll be spending my birthday there (on a Saturday yet), which will be a marvy way of marking my having survived another year and a fine excuse to treat myself with something fun.

Without the work visa, I could not have so much as picked up a paper clip to contribute to the project (RAL is a government institution and is very strict about such things), and I would only have been able to go and observe which would have defeated the main purpose of my going there (to learn how to do this stuff so we can help going forward since it's too much work to do in one place). I was, to be honest, stressed out of my mind about the whole thing because the non-refundable airline tickets are already purchased and the UK embassy in New York has my passport as part of the application process (which could have presented a travel issue if it was not returned in time, which could have happened if the application took longer than it normally does, which is a possibility in these sorts of things). So my stress level has dropped by orders of magnitude to say the least! So, I leave for Gatwick from Ottawa on September 22 and will be returning here on October 8.

If you're in the London/Oxford area then, I'd be happy to go for a pint (or a cup of tea of that's more your speed) while I'm there :-).

Woot!

Sep. 12th, 2017 09:12 am
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
We have received your application to graduate from Carleton University in November 2017. Your eligibility to graduate in November 2017 will be based on the published calendar requirements for the degree program stated below:

CURRENT DEGREE: Bachelor of Arts Honours
Major 1: Women's and Gender Studies

You should confirm that the status of your application to graduate indicates "PENDING" in Carleton Central. The status of PENDING will remain until Senate meets to award degrees. After Senate meets to confer degrees on October 27, 2017 the outcome of your application will be sent to your Carleton email account and the result will also be updated in Carleton Central.

At this time, your audit report should say "ALL REQUIREMENTS COMPLETED -- IN-PROGRESS COURSES USED" or "ALL REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BELOW HAVE BEEN MET". If your audit does NOT show one of these statements, then there are problems to be resolved and you should review this with your departmental advisor right away.


And I just checked and my audit does, indeed, say "ALL REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BELOW HAVE BEEN MET" :).

I must say that this has been quite the wild ride! This is heaven.

pheloniusfriar: (Default)
I have so much I want to do, so much pent-up desire (and sometimes need) to accomplish so many things after eight years as a "mature" (or at least elderly) undergraduate student. So many business ideas, so many technical ideas, so many geekly fun for myself ideas, so many social ideas, but I remain mired in making it from one day to the next. I really should have taken some time off to get my head straight, but it just didn't work out that way (in fact, I had negative amounts of time off because I started working for the university part time months before my semester was over, and was full time before my finals were written). With all that said, the reason was the bane of my hopes to accomplish the things I want: opportunity. The chances to work on things too cool for school (if you'll pardon the phrase as I am still, for all intents and purposes, at school) was too much to resist. It comes at a cost though for sure.

So where are things now, well, as stated, I am working on some truly amazing projects right now. These include both the Phase 1 (New Small Wheel muon tracker/trigger [not actually very small, fyi], in particular the small-wire Thin Gap Chamber, sTGC, sub-project that I did the testbeam at Fermilab for a few years back as a student research assistant and got authorship on a peer-reviewed journal article by working on) and Phase 2 (silicon inner tracker, ITk, in particular the end-cap strips sensors sub-project) upgrades for the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN (which will be upgraded to the High-Luminosity Large Hadron Detector with the replacement of the inner tracker system in 2025).

If all goes well, I just applied for a 5 year work visa for the UK (by way of UK Ancestry... my grandfather was born in Measham), and if I get it I will go for two weeks in mid-September (I've never been to the UK) to help test 48 wafers of a new batch of ASICs (integrated circuit chips, 450 per wafer) for the ITk project as part of a plan to start testing wafers here in Ottawa. There are hundreds of thousands of ASIC chips and thousands of sensors to be tested for the final detector, and we need multiple sites to do it at... Canada built the forward calorimeter for the current incarnation of ATLAS, and is working on the gas-filled detectors, the sTGCs, but this is the first time we've done silicon trackers like these, or at least on this scale. Anyway, if the visa thing works out, I might be going to RAL in the UK periodically over the next few years to work on this particular aspect of the project. I was supposed to make a side trip to CERN for the "ITk Week" where physicists from all over the world working on that project get together (I've never been there either, but I have been to TRIUMF, Fermilab, and DESY), but we're not sure when the wafers are going to be in, so it's kind of up in the air right now whether or not I make it to Switzerland (which I've never been to either).

I am also working on the Cryogenic Underground TEst facility (sorry, a PDF is all I could find that was public... slide 2 is worth checking it out for), CUTE (yes, CUTE...), which is an experiment that is part of the search for dark matter that will be installed at SNOLAB, 2km underground, early next year. It is going to use a 1kg chunk of ultra-pure germanium as its main detector element (huge for something like that, and crazy expensive). I have heard rumours that I may be asked to spend 6 weeks underground (well, heading underground each day... 5AM, ugh, but this will be for science!)... the first two weeks training (it's an active nickel mine in Sudbury, so there are real mining dangers on top of the danger of just being that far underground), and the next four weeks actually doing work. I had a chance to visit SNOLAB a couple of years back (I never got around to properly posting about it, which I am sad about), but I did post a couple of pictures I took while there. It really is like a villain lair from a Bond film or something... it's pretty surreal.

The other cluster of reasons why I am still not even close to being recovered from my undergraduate degrees is moving... and not even me. Firstly, my partner (we've been dating for a few years) could not find full time employment (much less anything with benefits) here in Ottawa (due to the way the federal government outsourced language training to a cartel), so had to move to Shanghai, China (teaching English as a Foreign Language) to get a living wage and extended medical insurance (we have universal health care, but it doesn't cover everything... like prescriptions and glasses and dental work unless they are outrageously expensive treatments or emergencies, for instance... I wouldn't trade it for the world having lived the alternative for a suffiently long time, but that's another story). She moved mid-June and that effort just about killed me dead (international moves are big things, I've done them before, but she didn't have a lot of resources, so sweat replaced money for a lot of things that had to get done). I did a radio inteview with her the week before she left that you can listen to here about her path through life that led her to where she is now. Her contract is for 15 months, but I am going to go visit her in Shanghai for two weeks in November! I've never been to China, so I am very, very excited (and Shanghai is a good introduction without going too deep, although I do hope to do one trip into another part of the country while I'm there). I was just starting to recover from that crazy process and my eldest daughter Beep finally decided to move out with two of her friends into a relatively nearby apartment. That happened last Saturday and it is still a work in progress (although 99% of the move is done now). It went relatively smoothly, but she had a lot more stuff than she thought she did, and it was a really hard job (moving hide-a-beds up from the basement here left some amount of injury, but nothing that's slowing me down too hard... I'm just freakin' exhausted). I'm heading over once I post this to her place for her housewarming party, and will be bringing a couple of serving spoons (she only has a ladle at the moment since her and her roommates didn't coordinate "stuff bringing" particularly well, heh), and a homemade vegetarian pizza to cook (I'm just waiting on the dough to finish and will bring the prepared ingredients in bags to assemble there). Her two roommates are effectively vegetarians (one will eat meat, but only if ethically sourced from personally known farmers), and I think that will be good for Beep (she's a whiz with vegetarian foods, we have always eaten a lot of vegetarian meals at home here). She is also continuing at college (Algonquin) in their Culinary Management programme, where she is learning to be a chef and to be able to run a kitchen or even restaurant. It's a good portable (almost universal) skill to have, and could open up a lot of doors for her all over the world if that's what she decides she wants to do. She is also talking about taking a degree in antropology at university eventually, and that would pair very nicely with a background in food... could be interesting, but we will see. Tuition is now free for low income families in Ontario (that'd be us, give or take a bit), so it is financially easier to go to school for both of them too (I completely missed out on it as it is only starting this fall). Happy had planned to move out at the start of the summer, but didn't quite get around to it, and for many reasons, has decided to stay with me for at least another year of school. She is going into her second official year in the psychology programme at Carleton (with minors in Women's and Gender Studies and Sexuality Studies... she has grown up around a broad spectrum of gender representations, so she is well placed to make contributions in those fields, imho). School starts for both of them in a week, so that's going to take a lot of effort on my part as well (if history is any indication). I do have to say I'm not looking forward to Carleton being packed to the rafters with people again soon, summers are so nice there...

My radio show, The Passionate Friar, is still going pretty well: an hour of feminism/social issues, physics/science, and music... news, reviews, interviews, ideas, engaging audio, and the Oxford comma! I've managed to up my game with interviews this summer and hope to keep the momentum going forward (I need to get more lined up for September now, but I think I will try more phone interviews, so it opens up a lot more possibilities). The shows are available "on demand" for somewhat over a year, so there is lots to listen to if you want to hear the people behind the physics (and science) and feminism (and social issues) you may hear/read about and benefit from. The list of shows to choose from is here on the CKCU web site. It's a long-form show (an hour), with some music for good measure (so it's not an hour of just talking). It gives a chance for people to warm up and share the stuff they are really passionate about and have devoted at least the current part of their lives pursuing. Some recent stuff includes: Ryan Couling and Matthew Johnston about their research into social media reactions to the Jian Ghomeshi trial; the writers for, and the editors and publishers of, the new young adult anthology Brave New Girls: Stories of Girls Who Science and Scheme; Lori Stinson on her research which ranges from patterns of pornography consumption, to corporate manslaughter and homicide laws, to the changing federal family violence initiative; Alex Nuttal on disability tropes in comics and Barbara Gordon /​ Batgirl /​ Oracle; S.M. Carrière about creating characters or talking with/​about people that don't share your lived experiences (e.g. LGBTQA+ if you're not, women if you are a man or visa versa, etc.); neuroscientist turned social worker Dr. Elaine Waddington Lamont; an interview with Canadian new wave synthpop band Rational Youth; an interview and live music with Xave Ruth on the intersection of math, music, and comedy; Dr. Michael Windover, historian of architecture, design, and material culture on his research, exhibits, and book on early radio in Canada; outgoing Carleton University President and Vice-Chancellor Dr. Roseann O'Reilly Runte about her French poetry, writing, and research; theoretical physicist Dr. Thomas Grégoire; science education innovators Martin Williams, Ian Blokland, and Mats Selen (2015 US Professor of the Year); Cindy Stelmackowich on the history of Canadian women in science, engineering, technology, and mathematics (STEM); etc., etc., etc..

Needless to say, every Wednesday morning, my mind is totally blown and I can be excited about life and everything in it all over again. It's good to be The Passionate Friar!!!

Lastly, and on the topic of "mind blown", if you're in Ottawa September 11, please come out to the Carleton University Art Gallery for the vernissage of the art gallery exhibit I helped to curate and produce! It's an amazing collection of artifacts from early women scientists in Canada and tells both the story of the tremendous contributions they made, and the forces that were arrayed against them simply because of their gender. It has been an indescribable privilege to have participated in such a unique exhibit. From the CUAG list of upcoming exhibits:

HERbarium
11 September – 03 December 2017
Curated by Josie Arruejo, Chelsea Black, James Botte, Brigid Christison, Michelle Jackson and Sharon Odell; in collaboration with Dr. Cindy Stelmackowich.

So, what is a “herbarium?” and why is she the focus?

A herbarium is a collection of dried and preserved pressed plants or fungi that are stored, catalogued and arranged systematically for study.

In highlighting the “her” within
HERbarium, this exhibition focuses on the highly skilled and too widely unknown women who contributed to the collection, identification, illustration, production and distribution of early scientific knowledge within the field of botany in Canada.

Because of the accessible nature of botany close to home, and a national pursuit and desire to see, describe and classify flora and fauna species that were distinct from Europe within a then-young Canada, botany was the first natural science formally practiced by Canadian women.

With examples of path-breaking contributions by Catharine Parr Traill, Lady Dalhousie, Faith Fyles, Dr. Irene Mounce and Dr. Mildred Nobles, this exhibition looks back at an important and underrepresented history. It also includes a copy of the “Privy Council Letter, 1920 – Women, Marriage, Employment” which outlines the federal policy in effect until 1955 that prohibited a woman upon marriage from continuing her career as a federal employee. The exhibition also looks forward at the continuing need to encourage women to pursue careers in science, where they face ongoing discrimination on the basis of intersections of gender, race, sexuality, dis/ability and class.

This exhibition has been developed for the Carleton Curatorial Laboratory in collaboration with Dr. Cindy Stelmackowich as part of her seminar “Representations of Women’s Scientific Contributions” offered through the Pauline Jewitt Institute of Women’s and Gender Studies at Carleton University.


If you're there, come say hi! I'll be the old, fat, bald, white guy standing awkwardly in the midst of many very cool and diverse young women ;). I do have to say that it was one of the most amazing courses I have ever taken... when I saw the title of the course, I knew there was no way I could not sign up; however, I had assumed it was going to be more research and essays and maybe classroom discussions. I was wonderfully, wonderfully wrong... it was many, many excursions to the hidden collections of Canada's national museums, practical hands-on work with many brilliant classmates, deeply engaging conversations about women in science (both historically and today), and working far outside my comfort zone on so many things. It was an absolutely magnificent way to cap my B.A. Honours degree in Women's and Gender Studies.

If that doesn't work, and you're here on October 17th... to the best of my knowledge, I should be there for this as well (see above re: potential travel to the UK or maybe even SNOLAB):

HERbarium: Exhibition tour with the curatorial team
Tuesday, 17 October 2017, 7:00 p.m

Please join us for a tour of the exhibition HERbarium, which was co-curated by Josie Arruejo, Chelsea Black, James Botte, Brigid Christison, Michelle Jackson and Sharon Odell, in collaboration with women’s and gender studies professor Cindy Stelmackowich.

Admission is free and everyone is welcome! CUAG is an accessible space, with barrier-free washrooms and elevator.


It does run until December 3, 2017 and I'd be happy to pop by if you get a chance to see it (just let me know a day or two in advance). I will be going in right after my show on Wednesday (August 30, 2017) to lend a hand or two in helping to set up the actual exhibit. It's delightful that we were actually able to get some amazingly rare artifacts to (safely) put on display, including Lady Dalhousie's 18th century personal herbarium, a first edition of Catherine Parr Traill's groundbreaking 1865 book "Canadian Wild Flowers" (a limited print run of 500 units, each with 10 colour plates, hand watercoloured by family members, it was the first "coffee table art book" published in Canada), amazing botanical artwork and science by Faith Fyles, and mycology (mushrooms and fungus) samples and other work by the pioneers in the categorization and study of fungi Dr. Irene Mounce and Dr. Mildred Nobles from the mid-20th century. The reproduction of the “Privy Council Letter, 1920 – Women, Marriage, Employment” (which was the "smoking gun" for so much of what we were trying to document regarding the limitations imposed on women) is just jaw dropping to read.

Just writing that, I feel like I need to go back to bed...

For a video today, hmmm... I think I need to repost something I seem to post every once in a while. The first video, "I Tak Bez Konca" by Polish musician Karolina Kozak is the United States I remember fondly and saw as the possibility of the place. Filmed in Savannah, Georgia, it often brings a tear to my eye (I actually know the people in the coffee shop from when I lived in North Carolina... it's a small world). The second video is the United States that we see on the surface and is the one the world is carefully watching: "I'm Afraid Of Americans" by David Bowie and Trent Reznor (Nine Inch Nails)... which will ultimately win, and at what cost? This is another place where a tremendous amount of my energy is going these days, just wondering if I'll have time to realize that nuclear war has broken out before me and my children and friends are all dead (we live in a national capital). I lived through the 70s and 80s, and I had hoped these days of fear were behind us. They are not, and I think it is even more dangerous (and possible) today than it was then given the multi-axis instabilities and extremism (and by that I mean established governments, not non-governmental groups) we are seeing all over the world. The Bowie/Reznor video sends chills down my spine when I watch it.





If that's too depressing... how about this song from Zepparella's original lineup (I have serious respect [and other feelings] for the drummer, she doesn't mess around when it comes to playing those things):



So much to live for still, let's get our shit together.
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
I have spent weeks (not solid, more as a background task) trying to figure out how to produce a silkscreen for a set of front and rear panels I have been working on. As I indicated a while back, I am learning AutoDesk's Inventor 3D CAD software. In general, I have found it to be an intuitive and powerful package; however, to finish the job, I needed to produce the artwork so I could get a silkscreen done (just some basic lettering for the faceplate for some of the electronics controlling part of an experiment to go into SNOLAB). Well, whatever intuitivity (my invented word of the day) there may be in the rest of Inventor, it doesn't exist when trying to do a silkscreen. All the web pages I read talked about how to add lettering to a design, but didn't explain how to export it to what was once called "camera ready artwork" (basically the artwork needed to create the screen for the application of the ink/paint). The few web pages that went into any detail were either very old or simply indicated that it was a waste of time to even bother trying, and to use AutoCAD instead. Ultimately, that was the route I went, but I haven't used a version of that software in probably 20 years and it's not the same package at all anymore, so it was a learn-from-scratch scenario again.

I am clawing my way, millimetre by painful millimetre, to productivity.

For posterity's sake, here's the procedure I followed (I know these show up on searches of the Intertubes; and if I don't write it down, I'll forget it myself):
  1. From Inventor, create a drawing at 1:1 scale for the 3D part's face that will be silkscreened (choose the proper sized "paper" to hold the whole drawing... C size in my case). Fill out the information box as necessary as this will be included in the output file from AutoCAD. I did this by going New->Drawing, then clicking on the Base button in the Create tools, then setting the scale to "1" and selecting the "Hidden Lines Removed" Style. I have two drawings them from the same 3D part: one that I dimensioned and gave to the machinist to make the actual part (which has different scales and such), and a new one that I created for the silkscreeen generation that just has the holes and cutouts and stuff along with the info box and page border.

  2. Close the drawing for the silkscreen in Inventor and open the drawing in AutoCAD (if you don't close it in Inventor first, AutoCAD complains that something else has it open and offers to open it in "read only" mode).

  3. On the Home tab in AutoCAD (we're done with Inventor), in the Layers tools, click on Layer Properties and then delete all the layers that are not going to be needed (there are a bunch). The way to do it is to turn off (the little lightbulb) all the layers and bring back the ones you need, then delete everything else you can (on this job, one layer could not be deleted or renamed for me). In my case, I kept the following layers and deleted the rest: 0 (can't delete), Border (ANSI), Title (ANSI), and Visible (ANSI). On the previous one I did, there was another layer (Defpoints) I could not delete. Furthermore, I could probably have deleted the Border (ANSI) layer in both, but I just left it hidden.

  4. To satisfy the requirements of the company I was sending my artwork to, I had to rename Visible (ANSI) to MECH (the mechanical layer that showed the holes and such), and Title (ANSI) to PAGE (which had the identification information on it and any further instructions). I then needed to create two new layers: WHITE (one layer for each colour... I was only doing a single colour since it was basic lettering), and REGISTER (to hold registration marks to allow for alignment of the panel to the screen).

  5. Go to the Layers tools and, using the pulldown, select WHITE (or whatever colour you are using). Changes made will go in that layer. Under the Annotation tools (in the Home tab), select Multi-Line Text (or single line if that's what floats your boat... I'm just providing my experience) and place whatever text is needed. I did not have any artwork (the logo for the project would have taken days to convert to a monochrome one and that was out of scope for me). The company I'm sending it to indicated that I should use colour #7 for all the layers. The existing layers were, thankfully, imported with that colour already.

  6. To place text, select Multi-Line Text, one corner of the rectangle to place it in, and then the other corner of the rectangle to place it in. Type text into the box, resizing it as necessary to fit the text the way you want (one or more lines). You can use Enter to put in a line break. The key is to select the correct justification to allow the text to be positioned exactly. For instance, I wanted to place text below a cutout for an AC Power Entry Module about the allowable voltages, the maximum current draw, and what fuses to use. I put the text on two lines (voltages and current, and fuse specifications), selected the Center alignment button in the Paragraph tools, and then selected Top Center TC from the pulldown Justification list in the Paragraph tools. If you are aligning it to something below it, use Bottom Center BC (Left or Right Center to align it to the side, but then use Left/Right alignment as well for the text). That gave me centred text with a handle in the middle of the text above the text that I could choose to align with the cutout. Select Close Text Editor way over on the right to finish editing the text (it can always be opened up again by double-clicking on it).

  7. Align and place the text where you want it... sadly, easier said than done. You will need some feature to align it to for starters. In my case, I had a rectangular cutout. In Inventor, lines have convenient middle handles that can be used for alignment, but in AutoCAD, just the ends of the lines have handles. As such, to centre my text below the cutout, I had to go to the Annotate menu and select the Centerline button from the Centerlines tools, then select the sides of the cutout to create a centreline. Once that was done, I could click on the text to select it, click on the square handle (at the top in the centre per my justification choice earlier) and then hover it over the centreline I just created to lock it on, then I could drag it down below the cutout and, as long as I didn't drag it too far off to the side, release the mouse button to drop it below the cutout along the centre line (it snaps to the feature). As you drag the text, there will be a dotted line to the feature it is locked to so you know it's aligned with the centre (or whatever). This took me a long time to figure out how to do, but it's nice and easy once I knew. You can also use the Center Mark tool from the Centerlines tools on holes and circular cutouts, which is preferable (on my previous design, I had a hole aligned above my square cutout that I used for alignment, it was a lot easier).

  8. To set the distance between the text and the feature, you need to go to the Parametric tab and select the proper tool from the Dimensional tools. In this case, I used the pull down on the left of the tools to select Vertical. The theory is that you constrain the text to be a certain distance from an edge or a hole or something, but the reality is not quite so easy. If it is a hole, then it seems to work out fairly well, but for a rectangular cutout even, it takes some work. To set my distance on the cutout, I first had to draw lines (the Line tool from the Home->Draw tools) along the centre line from its top point to its bottom point, and along the two perpendicular lines to the centre line of the cutout. I then used the Trim tool from the Modify tools, selected the newly drawn line over the centre line, and then the top line I just drew (the two reference objects), then do a right click with the mouse to terminate object selection and put it into trim mode, then click on the part of the new centre line that is above the cutout to trim it off. It will look like the line is still there, but it is the proper centreline that was added earlier. Delete the proper centreline, and the top line that was drawn on the cutout. That will leave the rest of the new line drawn over the centreline (with its top trimmed off) and the line drawn along the bottom of the cutout. Go back to Trim, select the centre line and the remaining perpendicular line at the bottom of the cutout, right click, select the bit of the centre line sticking out. Finally, there is a handle in that can be accessed by the Vertical tool from the Parametric tool (ugh). There may be better ways of doing this, but this is what worked for me. Then... start the Vertical tool, hover over the text and you will see a red circle with an X through it for the text handle. Click on it. Hover over the intersection between the centre line and the line along the bottom of the cutout to find the next handle (red circle with X) and click on it. Slide off to the side to drag the dimension off to the side and click to place it. Double click on the dimension value and put in what you want (e.g. 0.5 inches in my case). The Parametric tool will pull or push the text to the distance you asked for. Placing other text is generally variations on this theme. Once the text is placed... delete the lines (center and bottom) used to place the text and any leftover dimensions if any (deleting the lines deleted the dimension on my drawing), otherwise these will show up on your silkscreen, which is presumably not desired! If I wasn't already bald, I would be after wrestling with AutoCAD as long as it took me to get this to work.

  9. Rinse and repeat for any remaining text (if you figure out how to place images, maybe post below for others that might find this post... or give a link to an article on how to do it perhaps if it is detailed as what I'm doing here, no need to repeat it if it already exists). At this point, with all the text placed, it is probably a good idea to turn off all the layers except WHITE and make sure the only thing there is text (and that it is all there). If you accidentally placed text on the wrong layer, I know there is a way to move it, but I forget what I did.

  10. Select the REGISTER layer to place registration marks (always a good idea unless the company you're sending to doesn't want them). Here, the hover/lock function I talked about is used heavily. It's quick work once you get the hang of it, but be patient until it makes sense. So... select the Line tool and hover over a corner of the faceplate (or whatever), a hollow green square will appear, move the cursor vertically from the corner and a dotted green line will appear with an X at the end, once away from the corner, click to start the line and then move the cursor up further to define the direction of the line, then enter the length of the line (I used 0.9 inches), press Enter to accept the number, press Enter again to finish the line. You should have a vertical line that isn't touching the faceplate. Do the same to place a horizontal line at the same corner. Then go to the Parametric tab and set a Vertical constraint between the bottom of the vertical line and the horizontal line (I set the constraint to 0.1 inches), and then set a Horizontal constraint between the horizontal line and the corner. Make sure to select the reference line before the line to move/constrain or the reference line will move instead (i.e. for the Vertical line, select the end of the horizontal line first before the vertical line). Repeat for the other three corners and you will have a full set of registration marks of equal length and of equal distance from the four corners. Now... delete all the constraint dimensions so they don't show up on the silkscreen! Stuff is where it is supposed to be and that's enough.

  11. One of the last things I needed to do was to go back to the Layer Properties (under the Main tab) and change the width of the MECH, PAGE, and REGISTER lines (and your silkscreen layer lines if you added any) to values useful to the company doing the silkscreen. In my case, the default they wanted was 0.010 inches, which is about 0.25mm. As long as you didn't override the line width and left the Linetype as "by layer", this is simple from the Layer Properties list (it has a pulldown list of acceptable line widths). I then added some additional text to the PAGE layer (selecting it from the pulldown layers menu) to indicate the ink colour and the material I will be providing to silkscreen (they can acquire it themselves, but I will be giving it to them). This was according to the guidelines provided to me. Lastly, the company I was sending it to could only read AutoCAD files up to version 2007, so once I was done, I did another "Save As..." and saved it to AutoCAD 2007 format with a different name (just appended _ac2007). I send them an AutoCAD 2017 file before I realized that limitation and when they opened it, they said it was blank. When I sent them the 2007 format version, they were able to open it fine.

Well, a technical post, but hopefully it helps someone some day (or reminds me when I need to do it again!).

Hmmm... appropriate video here? Hmmm...

pheloniusfriar: (Default)
Received minutes ago...

Dear Phelonius Friar:

I am pleased to inform you that the Senate of Carleton University, at its meeting of June 2, 2017 granted you the following degree:

Bachelor of Science
Honours
Physics
Minor in Mathematics

This degree will be conferred at the Convocation ceremony held on June 13, 2017 at 9:30 am. Please bring your campus card with you for registration purposes. Please visit http://www.carleton.ca/convocation/ for complete details regarding the June 2017 Convocation ceremonies. You may also view the list of medalists approved at the June 2, 2017 Senate meeting. Graduates also enjoy discounts at the Carleton University Bookstore. Please visit them at: http://www.bkstr.com/carletonstore/home for details.

On behalf of Carleton University, I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate you on this important achievement.

Yours sincerely,
Suzanne Blanchard
Vice-President (Students and Enrolment) and University Registrar
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
Received in the past hour...

Dear Phelonius:

Congratulations! I am pleased to welcome you to the Bachelor of Arts Honours Women's and Gender Studies program at Carleton University. Enclosed are details regarding your offer of admission...


As stated before, I have completed all the requirements to graduate (they included an audit confirming it... the requirements change year over year, so it was possible that I could have gotten caught by something I didn't know about, but I'm good). So... as soon as I have graduated from my B.Sc. Honours program (I was told it would be around the end of May sometime, possibly early June), I can apply to graduate with the B.A. Honours (I already know my final grade as well, it's an A- ... not stellar, but pretty amazing for a degree I had not intended to get when I went to university, and much better than my final grade for physics, ugh). The convocation will be in the fall some time I believe. If you're in Ottawa on June 13, you are cordially invited to an apres-graduation soirée at my place in the evening (if you don't know the coordinates, message me).

In celebration, I present one of my favourite videos (it always makes me smile... and shake my head a little at it as I watch):



Never a dull moment!
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
I am still waiting for the Senate at Carleton University to grant me my B.Sc. Honours in Theoretical Physics (it usually happens at the end of May from what I understand), but I have gone ahead and applied for admission into the B.A. Honours Women's and Gender Studies programme, which should take about 2 weeks and will apparently be in time for the summer semester even though it has begun (I visited the Admissions Office this morning and that's their story and they're sticking to it). As soon as I'm accepted, I will apply to graduate in the fall as I have already completed all the requirements (to my knowledge). I am a broken man on a Halifax pier (and it has been more than 6 years since I sailed away), but it is a consolation that I survived (last year, there was some serious uncertainty) and the amount of time I spent in total is reflected in the multiple results (not my intent at all when I started, fyi).

I am now starting on life number eight (humans get about eleven, unlike cats, phew), at least per one of my favourite comics of all time, from Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal (there is much more to it than I repeat here to illustrate the points, so it's worth checking out):

http://www.smbc-comics.com/?id=2722
Here is something true: one day you will be dead.
Here is something false: you only live once.
It takes about 7 years to master something.
If you live to be 88, after age 11, you have 11 opportunities to be great at something.
These are your lifetimes.

Most people never let themselves die.
Some are afraid of death.
Some think they are already ghosts.
But you have many lives.

Spend a life writing poems.
Spend another building things.
Spend a life looking for facts,
and another looking for truth.

These are your lifetimes. Use them!
Which also reminds me of the final monologue in the movie Sucker Punch: https://youtu.be/s0tAif5OT1Q

And it also has a tinge to it of another comic that I have had pinned to the corkboard in my kitchen for years that I read at least once a week so I never forget (click on it to go to the page it is from):



I just found out that a very good friend had her visa application to teach in China approved last night and she will be leaving for over a year to do something that is utterly out of her comfort zone. She is a hero to me because she is starting a whole new life, and it is a beautiful and terrifying and magical thing to behold. And yes, I do plan to take her up on her offer to come visit her while she is there... I have never been to China.
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
I am now working full time at the university (as an electronics specialist... sadly, an extension of my previous life and not as a physicist, but I at least get to work with physics instrumentation all over the world, so it could be worse).

One of the main issues I'm facing right now is trying to get a set of tools up and running that will do all of the things that are being asked of me: FPGA and possibly ASIC design, schematic capture and PCB layout, laboratory instrumentation systems, integrated circuit manufacturing and quality control, mechanical design, safety and reliability engineering for electronics equipment to go in a mine (2km deep) or into the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, etc., etc., etc.. My total budget for purchasing tools and training is zero. $0. Nada. Zilch. Bupkis. Being at a university, however, I can get free access to a bunch of very expensive tools for research and academic purposes. Furthermore, I got the physics department to get a Canadian Microelectronics Corporation membership, so we can access even more tools through them. So far, I am learning AutoDesk's Inventor for 3D mechanical CAD, Mentor Graphics' PADS PCB (including DxDesigner) for schematics and board layout, Mentor Graphics' HDL Designer for FPGA and ASIC design, Xilinx's ISE and Vivado for FPGA synthesis (I need both because I'm designing for both old and new families, including Zync), Xilinx's ModelSim for FPGA simulation, CERN's ROOT for scientific analysis and computing (C++ framework), and LabView for instrumentation control. I use LibreOffice for documents and spreadsheets ;). I switch back and forth on the one computer system I have between Linux and Windows depending on what task I have to perform.

Needless to say, I'm overwhelmed with training myself on all these systems all at once (some of which have nearly no actually useful documentation). And I need them all to accomplish the work I have been asked to do. It's like drinking from a firehose, with predictable results... ;)

pheloniusfriar: (Default)
I just got my grade for the last class I had to take (4th year quantum mechanics), and I passed. I did not get the mark I was hoping for, but moving on to a new phase of my life is much more important (it has been so many years of being stressed out of my mind 24/7/365.25, it is going to take me a while to decompress). As such, I will be graduating in June (well, officially before then I presume, but ceremonially in June). I will have a B.Sc. Honours in Theoretical Physics with a Minor in Mathematics. As soon as I get the official word that I have graduated (it is pending now and needs to be approved by the university Senate, along with approvals for everyone else graduating), I will be applying for admission to the B.A. Honours Women's and Gender Studies programme. Having completed all of the requirements for that programme already, as soon as I'm accepted (presuming, of course), I will be applying to graduate from that as well (it will be a fall convocation for that).

Anyone in the Ottawa area is cordially invited to a party at my place the evening of Tuesday June 13th, which is the day of my convocation. I will hold a post-graduation party as well within a couple of weeks of that (probably the weekend of the 24th) for those who can't make it out on a weekday night. Just private message me if you don't know the way... Note: if you ask me for the way to San Jose, then that song will be stuck in my head, and I will hate you ;).

Profile

pheloniusfriar: (Default)
pheloniusfriar

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678 910
11121314151617
1819202122 2324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 25th, 2025 09:42 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios