pheloniusfriar: (Default)
Feminism every Friday from 6PM to 8PM (-ish) Eastern time zone. This old fat bald white male (B.A. Hon. Women's and Gender Studies) does their ding dang best.
https://www.twitch.tv/oldmanphelonius

Here are the links to the articles and other material I referenced in today's show:

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2023/jul/31/hair-loom-cusco-peru-women-weaving-tradition-wigmaking-cancer-alopecia
https://www.popmatters.com/crystal-castles-problematic-art-legacy
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/traveler-denied-woman-security-officer-for-search-1.6928353
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/aug/09/taiwans-metoo-movement-has-enmeshed-politicians-and-celebrities-but-a-culture-of-silence-endures
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/aug/09/mexico-president-amlo-gender-based-violence
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/aug/10/its-really-only-the-beginning-are-we-on-the-cusp-of-a-breakthrough-in-endometriosis
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2023/aug/09/kemisola-bolarinwa-tech-entrepreneur-cancer-tumour-detecting-bra-nigeria-acc
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/man-up-masculinity-crisis-part-three-1.6876116
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/aug/05/every-rising-sun-by-jamila-ahmed-review-a-feminist-take-on-one-thousand-and-one-nights
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/aug/05/somehow-i-failed-to-clock-her-magnificence-was-the-worlds-first-literary-hero-a-woman
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66375877
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/aug/07/between-the-world-cup-and-barbie-were-finally-having-an-honest-discussion-about-girlhood
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/divorce-housing-challenges-canada-1.6926859
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2023/aug/09/ladies-first-netflix-women-hip-hop-history-documentary
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-66423981
https://youtu.be/54fea7wuV6s
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
Feminism every Friday from 6PM to 8PM (-ish) Eastern time zone. This old fat bald white male (B.A. Hon. Women's and Gender Studies) does their ding dang best.
https://www.twitch.tv/oldmanphelonius

Here are the links to the articles and other material I referenced in today's show:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jul/22/ai-girlfriend-chatbot-apps-unhealthy-chatgpt
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-66349073 (Iran tape)
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/apr/09/latest-revelations-of-harassment-at-australias-antarctic-program-raise-hopes-for-change
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/29/portugals-bid-to-attract-foreign-money-backfires-as-rental-market-goes-crazy
https://www.housingrightswatch.org/sites/default/files/Mission%20to%20Portugal%20Report%20SR%20Adequate%20Housing.pdf
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/jul/30/my-hunt-for-eileen-george-orwell-erased-wife-anna-funder
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-66201042 (Etsy)
https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2023/jul/31/damn-i-wanna-be-like-her-londons-women-skaters-photo-essay
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2023/jul/31/hair-loom-cusco-peru-women-weaving-tradition-wigmaking-cancer-alopecia
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/academic-studies-subscriptions-libraries-1.6916687
https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/events/wewednesday-womens-entrepreneurship-series-educating-next-generation-innovators
https://www.popmatters.com/crystal-castles-problematic-art-legacy
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/aug/02/barbie-movie-flops-south-korea-feminism
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2023/aug/03/meta-google-and-youtube-profiting-off-posts-for-bogus-womens-health-cures-in-kenya
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/aug/02/lizzo-dancers-lawsuit-harassment-body-shaming
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-66379933 (Taiwan MeToo)
https://youtu.be/c9SUAcNlVQ4 (Emma Watson to UN)
https://www.heforshe.org/en
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
Feminism every Friday from 6PM to 8PM (-ish) Eastern time zone. This old fat bald white male (B.A. Hon. Women's and Gender Studies) does their ding dang best.
https://www.twitch.tv/oldmanphelonius

Here are the links to the articles and other material I referenced in today's show:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/bc-pseudolegal-claim-rejected-1.6912846
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jul/16/lbry-closes-odysee-cryptocurrency-tech-sec-fraud-extremist
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/couchsurf-affordable-housing-1.6910383
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jul/15/florida-hurricane-insurance-crisis-climate (last paragraph)
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-66244408 (AF beauty salons)
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2023/jul/19/gut-churning-anger-as-hungarian-president-addresses-major-womens-rights-conference
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jul/15/mike-pence-abortion-week-in-patriarchy
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66209168 (US diversity programs)
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66206542 (US defense bill)
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatoon/sexism-gender-equality-saskatchewan-news-surgery-sha-sma-1.6912909
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jul/19/texas-abortion-ban-court
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/18/why-uk-campaigners-fear-drive-to-decriminalisation-abortion-may-stall
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/21/brazil-sexual-violence-women-and-children-2022-report
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/21/india-arrest-women-stripped-naked-paraded-manipur
https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/fediverse-explainer-1.6905837
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/jul/19/were-not-all-broken-the-woman-who-pursued-her-rapist-for-five-years-and-won
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2023/jul/17/indonesian-muslim-women-metalheads-voice-of-baceprot
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
Feminism every Friday from 6PM to 8PM (-ish) Eastern time zone. This old fat bald white male (B.A. Hon. Women's and Gender Studies) does their ding dang best.
https://www.twitch.tv/oldmanphelonius

Here are the links to the articles and other material I referenced in today's show:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/jody-wilson-raybould-afn-aga-1.6905784
https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/gender-discrimination-report-afn-aga-1.6904681
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66141706 (Latvia)
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66139789 (Netherlands)
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2023/jul/14/myanmar-sexual-violence-junta-modus-operandi-naw-hser-hser-tells-un
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66174352 (Italy "10 second rule")
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jul/14/footballer-benjamin-mendy-found-not-guilty-of-one-count-of-rape
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/ottawa-police-hate-incident-data-july-2023-1.6899819
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/hate-related-incidents-up-reaction-1.6900447
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-femicides-1.6899109
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jun/28/climate-crisis-linked-to-rising-domestic-violence-in-south-asia-study-finds
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969718324446?via%3Dihub
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12697 (Kenyan women, climate change)
https://www.cbc.ca/news/climate/climate-heat-models-1.6905606 (hottest week on Earth on record)
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2023/jul/13/long-covid-global-south-lack-awareness
https://www.techradar.com/news/red-hat-pulls-funding-from-free-software-foundation
https://www.techradar.com/news/richard-stallman-author-of-the-gnu-manifesto-resigns-from-the-free-software-foundation
https://www.itpro.com/development/open-source/359199/fsf-defends-stallman-reappointment-following-red-hat-snub
https://www.cbc.ca/newsinteractives/features/living-with-a-dynamic-disability-first-person
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2023/jul/10/kenya-dj-programme-promoting-community-inclusivity-santuri-electronic-music-academy
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/jul/07/sex-education-tiktok-ob-gyns
https://vexashley.medium.com/on-ethics-and-desires-56d4910b2c73
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
Feminism every Friday from 6PM to 8PM (-ish) Eastern time zone. This old fat bald white male (B.A. Hon. Women's and Gender Studies) does their ding dang best.
https://www.twitch.tv/oldmanphelonius

Here are the links to the articles and other material I referenced in today's show:

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/jul/02/alison-bechdel-test-dykes-to-watch-out-for-cartoonist-interview
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/05/the-mother-of-neurodiversity-how-judy-singer-changed-the-world
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/topless-sunbather-complaint-rcmp-1.6898462
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/06/greta-thunberg-charged-with-disobeying-swedish-police-during-oil-protest
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jul/07/my-white-friends-trivialise-racism-by-labelling-everything-racist-how-do-i-tell-them-to-stop
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jun/30/far-right-finnish-minister-vilhelm-junnila-resigns-after-10-days-over-nazi-comments
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jul/06/moms-for-liberty-long-history-rightwing-activism
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/jul/02/aoc-conservative-supreme-court-authoritarianism
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jul/01/kamala-harris-supreme-court-rulings-attack-freedoms
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-66106067 (court limits communication with social media companies)
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jul/07/robert-jenrick-has-cartoon-murals-painted-over-at-childrens-asylum-centre
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-66130105 (government "Robodebt" system in Australia lead to suicides)
https://www.organism.earth/library/document/cyborg-manifesto
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
For those who don't know, I stream on Twitch several days a week as a "variety" streamer (possibly closer to random chaos than "variety" but it is what it is). Everything from building models, to coding (mostly in C), to electronics, to reading, to PC and console games, to feminism. I took a break from streaming for a while and started up again a couple of weeks ago (life was far, far too much for a while and I couldn't find the energy), and I've switched up what I did and am trying to firm up a schedule so people know when to show up for what (because not everyone likes everything I do). In particular, I thought I would be doing "Foodic Fridays", but a series of events convinced me I'd rather do "Feminism Fridays". Also, if you didn't know, I have a B.A. Honours in Women's and Gender Studies (graduated 2017).

It's every Friday from 6PM to 8PM (-ish) Eastern time zone.
https://www.twitch.tv/oldmanphelonius

Here are the links to the articles and other material I referenced in today's show:

I also read from the book "Feminism is for Everybody" by bell hooks.
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
This was written for a 4th year interdisciplinary Technology and Society class called “Forecasting”. As in predicting the future... what's not to love? From the syllabus: “This course will examine how we engage the future against a background of technological, societal and environmental change. We will do this by looking at forecasting and foresight techniques, and especially by considering science fiction: how it anticipates the future and how it changes the present.” One of the things we spent a fair amount of time on was Augmented Reality (AR) and Mixed Reality (MR), and when we were assigned to do a book report (on a book of fiction) that explored one or more of the subjects we covered, I went with AR since I had worked on AR-related stuff in the early 2000s as part of a tech startup (we didn't get the seed funding we were looking for because it was during the dot com bubble burst and nobody wanted to put any money into high tech, but that's another story). Anyway, if it wasn't clear, here there be spoilers yarrr, so proceed at your own peril if you ever intent to read this, or his related, books. As a further note, the structure was specified and is a little odd, but here we go.

Tombstone:
  • The book chosen: “Daemon” by Daniel Suarez. Published by Signet 2010, an imprint of New American Library, a division of Penguin Group (USA) Inc. Previously published in a Dutton edition, 2009. It was originally self-published by his own company, Verdugo Press, in 2006 under the author name Leinad Zeraus (his name spelled backward).
  • I did a number of Google searches for lists of books that contained mixed reality or augmented reality. The search that worked for me was “science fiction novels augmented reality”. I found a number of lists or mentions of specific books this way. Two books I saw on several lists or posts were the book by Suarez I chose, and Vernor Vinge’s “Rainbow’s End” (e.g. “What are the best novels about augmented reality?”, “Books About Video Games and Virtual Reality”). I made a list with a few other book titles and headed off to the Chapter’s at South Keys. The only book they had on that list was “Daemon”, so that is how the book was chosen: a combination of research, capitalist market forces, and luck.
  • Daniel Suarez received a B.A. in English Literature from the University of Delaware, but taught himself how to program and went on to become an information technology professional and systems consultant who worked for Fortune 1000 companies on “mission-critical software for the defense, finance, and entertainment industries”. He has been a speaker at TED Global, the MIT Media Lab, NASA Ames Center, the Long Now Foundation, and for various corporations. He is an avid PC and console gamer, and always loved creative writing and other creative endeavours such as running tabletop fantasy role-playing games. He has published four novels to date, all on ideas around technology-driven change, and his first, “Daemon” (originally self-published) became a New York Times bestseller. He lives in Los Angeles, California.
Outline:

The books has 45 chapters (617 pages), each of which is named, and is divided into three parts: Part One, Part Two: Eight Months Later, and Part Three: Six Months later. Thus, the events of the book take place within the span of under two years. Some chapters begin with a “news report” to provide relevant information in a condensed form needed to understand the story, most do not. Note: IVR is Interactive Voice Response (a prompt is played and speaker-independent voice recognition is used to determine which of a very limited number of voice responses is spoken). Also note: since it is a 45 chapter book, it was not possible to fit even brief chapter summaries into two pages.

The chapter-by-chapter spoilers are here... )

Point Of The Book:


The book seemingly had four primary purposes: to be a mainstream action-filled thriller for the thinking man, to promote and further valourize dominant misogynous alpha-hacker discourses, to explore the possibilities of multi-tier augmented reality systems, and to expound a philosophy that humans are not capable of effectively managing human culture. The story happens in our “today world” and as presented, it could even have happened in the past and we haven’t noticed yet.

As a thriller with technological content, every time a necessary computer or networking term is introduced, some ill-informed cop (or equivalent) stops the conversation and demands that the term be explained in very simple ways. The dialogue in the book is generally terrible, but they are mostly contained and the reader is rewarded with more scenes of violence or people of action doing action things. Some of the action scenes were real page-turners, and the book did make the New York Times bestseller list, so it obviously succeeded at this aspect of its purpose.

Infantile men looking to have their terrible opinion of women and fantasies of masculinity validated through fictional representations that support this world view would love the book for this. As is likely evident from my tone, I think this aspect of the book is highly problematic. Again, this likely had something to do with its rise to the bestseller list, but from the perspective of helping to move us into the future, it fails. Particularly considering the philosophies presented, this book would be a case in point for how human society is failing itself.

In terms of exploring the power of augmented reality and human/machine interaction, this book succeeds in a dramatic and creative way. The problem is that this part of the book is very near the end, and really only occurs in two chapters (one where it is demonstrated, and another where it is explained). For all that the writing was overall terrible from both a technical and attitude perspective, the book was worth reading for the ideas this small section contained. The augmentation took many forms, from simple voice and smartphone instructions, “go here, do that, say this”, through to full augmented reality headsets that allowed the wearer to operate in a game layer overlaid 1:1 on reality. When participants completed tasks, they were rewarded with points that confer upon them rank and material gain in the real world. The Daemon implemented a fully distributed human-powered manufacturing industry, “give this part to this person, that person assembles two parts and passes it on, etc.”, and uses such operatives to extend its power and reach into the physical world using humans as its effectors. The idea of integrating system-purpose (machine goals), human flexibility, and loosely coupled (and possibly locally unreliable) distributed algorithms is a powerful paradigm.

Lastly, in terms of philosophy, it is spelled out in the book: “Mammals of every species indulge in play. Games are Nature’s way of preparing us to face difficult realities. [...] Civilization is about to fail. [...] The modern world is a highly efficient, precision machine. But that’s its flaw – one wrench in the works and it all grinds to a halt. So what does our generation get? A culture of lies to hide weakness. Decreasing freedom. All to conceal one simple fact: the assumptions upon which our civilization is based are no longer valid. If you doubt me, ask yourself: why was I able to accomplish this? [...] But what if we corrected civilization’s weakness – as painful as that correction might be?” Here, is another part of the mythos that is being supported: that society is in chaos and we need heroes with grand visions to save it (and a male techno genius is “just the person to do it”).

Pretty much everything in the book from an ideological point of view is a rehash of a well-worn hero myth amongst bit-heads and hackers, but the creative use of AR to redesign the way human systems could be made to function is still a very clever notion.

Connection to this Course:

The characters in this book are hegemonically masculine – even the one woman portrayed as having agency (the rest are there simply to prop up another character’s performance of “male”) – and thus operate with a nearly pure Dominant Western Worldview (DWW). It is notable that there are no non-Western/non-white individuals in the entire story (with the exception of a bartender that behaves Western in every way), and the few non-white characters display hegemonic whiteness in their actions. In fact, if they weren’t labelled by the author as being non-white, there would be no way to tell by their behaviour. Again, this supports the DWW of the characters and the author himself.

The main human characters of the story are the dead game developer and hacker Matthew Sobol, police detective Pete Sebeck, government agent and hacker Natalie Philips, foreign actor and hacker Jon Ross, TV reporter Anji Anderson, criminal and hacker Brian Gragg, former soldier and now FBI Hostage Rescue Team member Roy “Tripwire” Merritt, and mysterious man of power “The Major”. All of these characters act as though they truly are the masters of their own destiny, and everyone and everything around them is there to facilitate this self-actualization. Their goals are universally to assert their will upon their personal domains. Sebeck and Merritt are the only two characters that seem content to only control a small part of the world, while the rest know no boundaries in their goals of achieving power and recognition. At no point are any resource limitations discussed, and thus the only determinant of potential is ambition. Finally, all of the characters believe and act as though every problem they face has a solution, if only they can be clever and persistent enough to find out how to assert control. Sebeck, when he is framed by the Daemon, convicted, and sentenced to death, is put in a position where his problem does not have a solution that he can see, and thus it becomes an unfairness and a tragedy. Meanwhile Philips and Ross are doing everything they can to save him and continue the narrative that the program can be solved. They are ultimately frustrated in their efforts, but it is indicative of the Daemon’s power being greater than theirs, and thus it is able to achieve domination when they cannot. It’s one big pissing match and all of it told from a variety of privileged white male Western positionalities (again, even the “black woman” behaves like a white Western male of considerable power).

Much of the tension of the book is in the programmed behaviour of the Daemon as it seems to be operating in a Human Exceptionalism Paradigm (HEP). There is no indication that Sobol operated in in anything but a DWW manner, but he obviously had philosophical or ideological notions that were expressed through his creation of the Daemon. Like Dr. Frankenstein, Sobol seems to be a profoundly flawed individual, and the monstrosity of his creation is similarly an inevitable product of its origins and manner of construction. The Daemon was based on a series of MMORPGs written by Sobol. In a game environment, there is a lack of challenge if a DWW is assumed for player characters – there is nothing to strive for. It has been shown in the book’s world that cooperation and shared challenges (or at least challenges that are experienced by all in common) motivate people to keep playing. In the game environment, there is no physics being – it is all social and cultural factors that govern how it unfolds as a group activity. The final stated goal of Sobol’s Daemon to overthrow current human society and replace it with one built around the technology it brings, explicitly supports the notion that progress will happen through technology whether humans are in control of said technology or not – that it is an inevitable and never-ending situation.

At the end of the book, Sobol (as a semi-interactive recording), stated that as the Daemon took control of the economy, those who had vested interests in the old, DWW, society took steps to protect themselves, their wealth, and thus their position of power and dominance. However, since the Daemon had become able to monitor nearly all transactions everywhere, it knew who was doing this and claims that “now they are more vulnerable than ever”. The recording of Sobol, on behalf of the Daemon goes on to say “My enemies will show themselves soon, Sargeant. As much as you despise me, they are your true enemy. I am merely an inevitable consequence of human progress.” Thus, progress is inevitable, and progress through technology is the way it happens. This machine-driven revolution will provide the solution to all of humanity’s current and foreseeable future problems. Games have been evolving to be more and more integrated with the mechanisms we have for reward, motivation, and avoidance; thus it is entirely plausible that the social structures we have created to maintain society through those neural pathways can be extended from the game world to the physical world – especially when mixed reality technologies increasingly blur that line.

At no point in the book is any mention made of a perspective that could be interpreted as New Ecological Paradigm (NEP).

Given the particular content of the book, the manner the story was structured, and the behaviour of the characters in it, and what was missing from the book, it seems plausible that the author has a Dominant Western Worldview themselves. However, like Sobol, the author seems to feel that DWWs are doomed to collapse, and violently at that.



Bonus video content... want to know what a future where AR/MR is ubiquitous could look like?

pheloniusfriar: (Default)
I am digging through boxes upon boxes upon boxes looking for where I put my stupid birth certificate (which I need for some paperwork). I had taken it out of my wallet in 2019 because I was traveling overseas and figured that carrying my passport and birth certificate was probably a security risk (doing so domestically was as well, probably more so), and I put it somewhere safe. It's in the house, but it might as well be on Ceres. As I dig through boxes, I am uncovering some essays that I wrote but never posted.

The second one was written for a 4th year Women's and Gender Studies class (which was actually an English course... so... much... reading...) called "Women Travel Writers" with Dr. Roseann O'Reilly Runte. This was an amazing class done in a proper interactive seminar style. My classmates were all top knotch, and the discussions were always challenging and engaging. In addition, given her rank and position, Dr. Runte brought in some pretty amazing guests to the class. For instance, we got to talk to Charlotte Gray, the author of “Sisters in the Wilderness, The Lives of Susanna Moodie and Catharine Parr Traill” (fyi, I was studying Parr Traill for a gallery exhibit I was co-curating). There was an archives specialist who presented work done by Emily Carr. We had an amazing informal chat with Dr. Sharon Johnston (the then "wife of the Governor General") who was all forms of kick-ass and talked about her grandmother who was the inspiration for her novel "Matrons and Madams". And, I got to meet Roberta freakin' Bondar and hear the story of how she got to be an astronaut and then went on to become a professional nature photographer! Anyway, it was a great course, and the essay I had to write was on, gasp, women travel writers. Because one of the books we read in class, Jan Morris' "Last Letters from Hav", was fictional (but written like traditional travel literature), I felt I had permission to similarly use fictional travel writing, and chose this book. I will always remember Elisabeth Vonarburg fondly for attempting to teach me some Simon and Garfunkel songs on guitar one night in the Con Suite at a convention in Montreal. This is an exceptionally good book as well that I have read more than once. I further bring in Ursula K. LeGuin's foundational book The Dispossessed.

Elisabeth Vonarburg’s Pragmatic Utopia: “In The Mothers’ Land”

As long as there are social issues, there will be room and a need for utopian discourses along with, of course, resonant dystopian visions. Both literary genres explore the possible in order to encourage contemplation of the actual – whether through careful consideration by the reader, or by attempting to elicit a visceral response to the depictions they provide. But rather than just telling a story, “writers of utopian and dystopian fiction call for social and political action: in utopias, by describing a world in which we want to live, and in dystopias, by warning us of the consequences of current social and political trends” (Little). With our species’ new-found ability to destroy itself and potentially most life on Earth (or at least permanently cripple our collective ability to thrive), examinations of potentiality have assumed critical importance; and in our current age of postmodernist feminism, the literary and conceptual tools we can bring to bear on these questions offer a sophistication that is also unparalleled in history. To explore some key central contemporary themes and styles, I will examine categories of modern feminist utopian and dystopian stories, then focus on Quebec writer Élisabeth Vonarburg’s novel In The Mothers’ Land (originally Chronique du Pays des Mères, and later published as The Maerlande Chronicles), and discuss American Ursula K. LeGuin’s novel The Dispossessed.

The rest of the essay is here... )

Where utopian and dystopian stories have a long and venerable history, they have been criticized for being prescriptive and unrealistic. Modern entries into that genre, such as the works examined here, have managed to escape from the limitations and lack of subtlety that characterized so many earlier works. Strong use of allegory and postmodern feminist writing techniques (early postmodernism for The Dispossessed and late postmodernism for In The Mother’s Land) make these works fully critical analyses of society and social structures. These authors are not afraid to problematize their utopias – they do not fear the imperfection of their visions. On the contrary, “what differentiated these new utopias was their attempt to evade the traditional criticisms of the old utopias [...]: that they were static, boring, and unattainable. After all, utopias are not required, by definition, to be perfect. There seemed no reason to believe that all of humanity's problems could be solved through improved social organization; but it seemed possible that some of them might be” (Brians). The novel The Dispossessed was ultimately subtitled “An Ambiguous Utopia” in later editions and built on (and revolutionized) the traditions of American science fiction, tropes of individual exceptionality, and of the travelogue. LeGuin also claims that she was inspired by the anarchist writings of Murray Bookchin (Davis and Stillman), in particular Post-Scarcity Anarchism (Bookchin), in her portrayal of Anarres. Vonarburg is obviously influenced by the same American literatures (including, presumably, LeGuin), but could also draw from the traditions of French experimental and utopian fiction – for example, Hélène Sixous, Madeleine Gagnon, Nicole Brossard, and Jeanne Hyvrard (Santoro). With the tools of ambivalence and ambiguity at their disposal, both authors were able to create believable societies where better ways could be imagined, but could remain solidly grounded in the humanity of their visions. As readers, it is easier to travel along with a writer, and weigh the merits of their interpretations and stories, if the suspension of disbelief we must employ to follow them does not become the dominant tool that we need. In that regard both The Dispossessed and In The Mother’s Land succeed in a way every bit as engaging as the long tradition of non-fiction works by women travel writers.

And the bibliography is here... )
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
I just got back from the two weeks in Shanghai, China and realized that is the first actual vacation I have had in four years (when I went to a friend's cottage for four days). There is no wonder I've been so burned out. I had a great time and really liked the place: it is dynamic and vibrant, a broad mix of influences, and was culturally diverse (meaning many Asian cultures and some Western cultures). Taking ground transportation (maglev) that hit 430km/h was mind blowing given the rather pedestrian speeds available on any ground transportation I've ever taken in Canada. The banking and financial sophistication there — right down to the most basic transactions with street food vendors (btw, zomg yummy!) — was also so far advanced over anything I've experienced before. Don't even get me started on social media: there, it facilitates in-person experiences rather than insulating from it and has features I've also never seen on this side of that pond to faciliate real-world communities. On a separate note, on my first outing with locals for dinner, it was inevitable: they ordered a "soup with two eggs", which was one of their favourite dishes (each person ordered a dish to share at the table). One egg was egg drop in the soup and the other was, of course, a century egg. Gotta say I was hoping to make it through my trip without having to face one, much less having it served in such a social situation. The verdict: it actually tastes good, and the texture wasn't as sketchy as I thought it would be :-). I would definitely have it again in a dish, but I can also say that I'm not going to rush out and buy a dozen to start tossing in ramen at home ;-). Baby steps. Next up? Probably chicken feet.

On my last evening there, I gave a presentation on the amazing $4 CY8CKIT-049-42xx Cypress PSoC development kit at the Xinchejian hacker space weekly open house. I use it in a number of projects I've been working on, and it's an order of magnitude more complicated (at least) than the Arduino processors that are in wide use, so I thought it might be of interest (and they did too as they invited me after I pitched the idea to them). Despite some A/V technical issues, the talk went well and there were quite a number of questions during and after (talks were given in both Chinese and English). The dev kit is also available on Taobao in China for nearly the same price (¥29.00), which is good. Hopefully more on that later, but I need to try to sleep again as I am jet lagged as fuck and need to adjust my schedule back to Ottawa time as soon as I can (I tried to sleep earlier as I was crazy tired, but I couldn't drift off, thus this post). I can't wait to go back and do some deeper exploration (and with more Mandarin language skill than I went with this time, which was effectively zero, if not less... but everyone was quite patient and we made it work by pointing and smiling to each other, or with the aid of a translator on one of our phones). Lots of other great stuff happened while I was there, but I'm going to stop here for this post. So... time to finish the series...

These short biographical essays were written as part of a 4th year Women's and Gender Studies seminar class I took in the winter/spring of 2017 called “Representations of Women’s Scientific Contributions” with Dr. Cindy Stelmackowich at Carleton University. Each of the essays required deep research into difficult to find historical and contemporary info-fragments and sometimes oblique references in order to find a coherent and accurate narrative. They also needed to be short (always a challenge for me).

Born in 1896 along the Bay of Fundy, “as a child she sailed around the world with her [sea captain] father” and growing up “often played by the shoreline, studying the tiny creatures in the water – the beginnings of her interest in fossil invertebrates” (Monteith, 1993). She earned a B.A. in general arts from McGill in 1919. However, after finishing her B.A., a field trip to Manitoba with Alice Wilson, whom she met at McGill, inspired her to follow a career in geology (Sherriff & Reuter, 1994). She went on to get her M.A. from the University of Toronto (UofT) in 1923, in 1926 became “the first woman in Canada to get a Ph.D. in geology/paleontology”, and further was “the only woman [in Canada] to have an academic position during the interwar period” in that field (Ainley, Rayner-Canham, & Rayner-Canham, 2012). She served as Associate Director and then Curator of Invertebrate Palaeontology of the Royal Ontario Museum (ROM) from 1936 to 1957, professor of paleontology in the Department of Geology of the UofT from 1956 to 1967, and then as professor emeritus in the Department of Geology at the UofT and Research Associate in the Department of Invertebrate Palaeontology in the ROM until her death in 1990 (aged 94) (Monteith, 1993). Regarding her association with Alice Wilson, it is important to note that in 1938, for her work at the Geological Survey of Canada, Wilson became the first woman to be elected a fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. In 1942, for her prolific and influential work on invertebrate fossils and her prowess as a curator and administrator, Fritz became the second woman to receive that honour (Friedland, 2013).

Fritz’s relationship to her mentor at the UofT, William A. Parks, is mentioned in nearly every article on her career. It is telling that even in the mid-1920s, Parks was willing to share credit with her. For instance, a mid-1920s US government index of geological work contained the following reference: “Parks, William A. 1711. (assisted by Madeleine Fritz). The stratigraphy and paleontology of Toronto and vicinity; Part III, Gastropoda, Cephalopoda, and Vermes: Ontario Dept. Mines, 31st Ann. Rept., vol. 31, pt. 9, 45 pp., 5 pls., 1923.” (Loughlin & Mansfield, 1926). In 1971, she wrote a biography of Parks (Fritz & Museum, 1971) in which she indicated a number of notable individuals to whom he was instrumental in launching the careers of; however, she does not number herself in that list, although she acknowledges his role in her own bio at the end. While Parks facilitated her advanced studies – she was the only woman graduate student at the UofT in the 1920s – and worked with her at the ROM, she indicated that she operated in an overall atmosphere of acceptance and encouragement, and commented “that she felt accepted by the men and that no one tried to discourage her” (Ainley et al., 2012). At the same time though, “aware of the difficulties married women faced in academe [...] chose to remain single and pursue graduate studies” (Ainley et al., 2012).

During her career, she published more than 70 academic papers on samples that she both received and collected from the west of Canada (Fritz, Unknown) to the east (Fritz, 1966) and points in between (Fritz, 1957), and was responsible for the discovery and naming of several new species (see, e.g., (Fritz, 1941)) and the re-classification of others (Fritz & Royal Ontario Museum, 1981). Her impact on the field of invertebrate paleontology cannot be understated as “she achieved world renown for her scientific papers on fossil Bryozoa”, and “so many Fritz-educated professors have taught in paleontology departments of universities around the world that she has been called ‘the great-grandmother of Paleozoic Bryozoa’” (Monteith, 1993). Despite direct opposition by the Geological Survey of Canada to women participating in field work (Ainley et al., 2012), she continued to engage in such endeavours through much of her career while also working as a researcher, administrator, and teacher. “Her three-pronged professional path was unique in the history of Candian women and science, because men dominated such positions in geology/paleontology, in both university and museum settings. [Other successful women] followed the more usual path of ‘surrogate mother’ as dean or warden for women” (Ainley et al., 2012). Fritz’s professional ambitions, determination, and resourcefulness stand out to this day as exceptional during the times in which she flourished (Prentice, 1991), and while she perhaps sacrificed her personal life to be allowed to work, opened opportunties to many that followed.

And the very useful references are here... )
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
These short biographical essays were written as part of a 4th year Women's and Gender Studies seminar class I took in the winter/spring of 2017 called “Representations of Women’s Scientific Contributions” with Dr. Cindy Stelmackowich at Carleton University. Each of the essays required deep research into difficult to find historical and contemporary info-fragments and sometimes oblique references in order to find a coherent and accurate narrative. They also needed to be short (always a challenge for me, heh). Obviously, research into living scientists was a bit easier with the advent of the web (and Dr. Conlan is known by some in non-scientific circles from having been featured in magazines like Canadian Geographic and for her children’s books on her research, so there are popular sources as well).

Born in Ottawa, Ontario in 1950, Kathleen (Kathy) Conlan is an active Research Scientist at the Canadian Museum of Nature focused on antarctic and arctic marine benthic (bottom dwelling organism) ecology and amphipod systematics that, in addition to its pure research value, is a means of studying long term climate change, the effects of pollutants, and the impact of fisheries on marine life (Canadian Museum of Nature, 2015). She also studies the effects of ice scours (the scraping of the sea floor by moving icebergs and ice packs) on benthic life (Conlan & Kvitek, 2005), and the ecology of underwater canyons (Conlan, 2016). Her work is so influential that she has become synonymous with her field of research in the scientific community, for example “studies of sea-bed disturbance, especially the effects on crustacean communities of chemical toxins, are Kathy Conlan’s work” (Riffenburgh, 2007).

Conlan also engages in continual public outreach, education, and the popularization of her work through talks, direct engagement with students, museum exhibits, and public demonstrations, e.g. (Vancouver Aquarium, 2017), (Canadian Museum of Nature, 2010), (Racette, 2007), (Hill, 2003), and (Nguyen, 2015). She has also written a children’s book about her work called “Under The Ice” that has won at least 8 awards (Kids Can Press, 2017), including the prestigious Science in Society prize for a children’s book handed out by the Canadian Science Writers’ Association, since it was published in hardcover in 2002 (Conlan, 2002). In 2015, she was named one of Canada’s greatest explorers by Canadian Geographic (Canadian Geographic, 2015). In addition to her research, her infectious enthusiasm for her work and respect for the people who live in the arctic (Hill, 2003), has made her a welcome visitor and educator of young and old alike. Conlan states of her motivations for outreach and knowledge sharing, “the founding idea was that if youth knew about the Arctic and Antarctica they would protect and stand up for it against any exploitation that might occur in the future [...]. In essence, we were creating a bunch of ambassadors.” (science.ca, 2015).

While she grew up in Ottawa, it was a trip to the west coast when she was 16 that ignited the interest that led to her career, “I was really taken with the ocean and marine life at that point, and that trip really solidified my interest in going into biology” (science.ca, 2015). She got her B.Sc. (Honours) at Queen’s University in 1972, her M.Sc. in marine ecology at the University of Victoria in 1977, and her Ph.D. in systematics and evolution from Carleton University in 1988 (Canadian Museum of Nature, 2015) (CCAR, 2015). She has been Chief Officer (2008-present) and Secretary (2004-8), Life Sciences Scientific Standing Group for SCAR (Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research); Member, Canadian Committee for Antarctic Research (1998-present); Adjunct Professor, Department of Biology, Carleton University (2004-present); and Section Head, Life Sciences Program, Canadian Museum of Nature (2006-present) (Canadian Museum of Nature, 2015). While it is impossible to draw conclusions, it is notable that she was one of four women out of 14 members (28.6% women) of the Canadian Committee on Antarctic Research (CCAR) for 2014-15 (CCAR, 2015). The number does agree with with studies done at the time that shows that 22% of STEM professionals are women (Shendruk, 2015).

Conlan is all the more interesting in that this particular field of study is not necessarily attractive or even accessible to many due to cultural bias and socialization – in short, the “ick factor” of studying sea “bugs” (Hildebrand, 2005). Hildebrand writes that while on an unsuccessful mega-fauna (i.e. whale) spotting tourist trip aboard an arctic research vessel (with Conlan on board), a lack of whales to be spotted caused them to turn to whatever activity they could find on the ship. Their writing shows that Conlan’s passion is obvious as she studies the amphipods she has brought up from the sea floor as she exclaims, “look at this [...] here’s a female with a brood pouch of fifteen”, or “this one’s a male [...]. You can see he's holding a female under his thorax. They'll mate when the female molts. It's very exciting to watch!”. In stark contrast, Hildebrand felt that “there is nothing spiritual in these lives, nothing exultant; they are simply grist for larger animals” (Hildebrand, 2005). Such attitudes only serve to emphasize the importance of the work, both in research and outreach, that Conlan and scientists like her are doing – it is work that is crucial to understanding global ecosystems and our impact on them, yet is unglamourous in the eyes of the average person, with the exception of the breathtaking photographs of her diving under Antarctic ice.

And the very useful references are here... )
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
Zomg!

October 27, 2017

Phelonius Friar
Ottawa, ON

Dear Phelonius Friar:

I am pleased to inform you that the Senate of Carleton University, at its meeting of October 27, 2017 granted you the following degree:

Bachelor of Arts Honours
With High Distinction
Women's and Gender Studies

This degree will be conferred at the Convocation ceremony held on November 18, 2017 at 9:30 am. If you do not attend the convocation, diplomas will be made available for pick up at the Registrar's Office beginning November 21st for a period of 2 weeks.

On behalf of Carleton University, I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate you on this important achievement.

Yours sincerely,
Suzanne Blanchard
Vice-President (Students and Enrolment) and University Registrar

This email was generated from the Carleton University student information system. Please accept this as official documentation from the University.


I'm a little broken hearted that I can't walk the convocation stage as I will be in China from November 10 through the 23rd, that was insanely hard work to get and I'd have loved to get my thirty seconds of recognition :(. But... being in China as the reason why I'm missing it is at least a good reason.

pheloniusfriar: (Default)
These short biographical essays were written as part of a 4th year Women's and Gender Studies seminar class I took in the winter/spring of 2017 called “Representations of Women’s Scientific Contributions” with Dr. Cindy Stelmackowich at Carleton University. The work that we did in that class, and as volunteers over the following summer, led to the well-received exhibit “HERbarium” at the Carleton University Art Gallery (which will run until December 3, 2017). The exhibit looks at the groundbreaking work of global reach and implication by five Canadian women scientists. In the case of three of those women, their work remained virtually unknown outside of their specific scientific fields and utterly unknown to the broader public. The work done for “HERbarium” will be informing a much, much larger exhibit at the Canadian Museum of Nature in 2018 that is being curated by Dr. Stelmackowich. This essay was about one of the women whose work was included in the exhibit – the other two essays (to follow) examined the work of other women (not in the exhibit). Each of the essays required deep research into difficult to find historical fragments and sometimes oblique references in order to find a coherent and accurate narrative. They also needed to be short (always a challenge for me, heh).

As a further note, the abstract/proposal I submitted to Gender Summit 11 on the work we did on “HERbarium” and its value as historical and feminist research was accepted, and I will be presenting a poster (along with one of the other students that worked on the “HERbarium” exhibit) at the conference Nov. 6 through Nov. 8 in Montréal, Québec. At the conference “600 advocates of gender equality from science, innovation and development will participate. The overarching theme this year is
Embracing pluralism and thriving through diversity – shaping science and innovation. The Gender Summits are a series of interconnected, action-based events held across the globe since 2011. They follow the theme of Quality Research and Innovation through Equality. Their aim is to make gender equality in research and innovation the norm and to embed gender equality as a primary dimension of quality”. I am very excited to be participating in the first one held in North America!

Catharine Parr Traill (née Strickland) was born in London, England on January 9, 1802, the fifth daughter of Thomas Strickland (Morgan, 1903), manager of the Greenland Docks on the Thames, and Elizabeth Homer who went on to have another daughter and two sons together. Soon after her birth, her father retired from the docks and they moved a number of times to keep up with his various business interests, all the while receiving instruction from him “in such subjects as geography, history, and mathematics, all of which he oversaw; [while] his wife took charge of their development in the traditional feminine skills” (Peterman, 2003), which included dairy work and vegetable farming that would be valuable skills later in her life (Hobbs & Goddard, 2001). While living on a farm in Suffolk, “it was here that Catharine’s most vivid memories of childhood were formed. She recalled in particular fishing with her father [...] while being read to and reading from his copy of Izaak Walton’s The compleat angler. ‘The dear old Fisherman,’ as she told author William Kirby in 1895, had helped when she was a child ‘to form my love of Nature and of Natures God’” (Peterman, 2003). However, Thomas’ business interests increasingly kept him away from home and the Strickland children were left to find their own ways of occupying their time. In Catharine’s case, it was to work on the writing of stories to share with her siblings and family friends, and the collection of plants as her father had taught her to do.

Thomas died in 1818 and left the family in relative poverty when his business ventures failed, and Catharine turned to publishing her stories, starting at the age of 15, as a means of contributing to the family’s upkeep (Peterman, 2003). “She was the first of the sisters to commence writing, and it was the favour with which her stories and sketches were received by the public that led her elder sisters to enter the same field” (Morgan, 1903). Most of her early works were tales of Christian and Victorian morality intended for a young audience, e.g. (Strickland, 1822), (Strickland, 1823), (Strickland, 1825), and (Strickland, 1828); however, she did increasingly publish a books on her experiences as a naturalist, but still for a younger audience, e.g. (Strickland, 1930), (Strickland, 1831a), and (Strickland, 1831b).

In 1832, she married the Scottish widower Lieutenant Thomas Traill against the wishes of her family and they soon emigrated to Canada to escape financial hardship. In 1836, Catharine published her most famous work, “The Backwoods of Canada. Being Letters from the Wife of an Emigrant Officer, Illustrative of the Domestic Economy of British America” (Traill, 1836), written “using the kind of realistic detail that has become a tradition in Canadian literature” (Canada Post Corporation, 2003). While it details the hardships she faced attempting to settle in Canada, “it consistently measures Canadian experience through the lens of respectability, social class, and good taste, and in terms of interests congenial to women of similar background” and “to make clear the kinds of adjustment, effort, and resolve that were necessary if one was to adapt to Canada’s primitive and demanding circumstances” (Peterman, 2003). It was explicitly meant to be part of the colonial effort along with her subsequent books “all of which had a marked influence in promoting emigration to Canada”, including “‘The Canadian Crusoes’, ‘The Female Emigrant’s Guide’, ‘Rambles in the Canadian Forest’, ‘Studies in Plant Life in Canada’, ‘Pearls and Pebbles’, and ‘Cot and Cradle Stories’ (Morgan, 1903).

Her husband Thomas suffered ongoing financial hardships both in Canada and back in England, and continued to move Catharine and her seven children (two of their nine children had died in the 1840s) from place to place in Ontario looking for success. But the 1850s presented “an increasingly difficult struggle marked not only by deaths, illnesses, lack of firewood, and crop failures, but also by the incapacitating bouts of depression suffered by Thomas”, who ultimately died in 1859 leaving the family in destitution (Peterman, 2003). Catharine rarely complained in any of her writings or to her friends, but continued to write as a means of supporting herself and her family.

By 1861, Catharine had completed the manuscript for “a groundbreaking work on hundreds of local plants” but “despite commendations by professors, no Toronto firm was willing to risk publishing a long, specialized book” (Globe, 2015). To make the book more attractive to publishers, she enlisted the help of her niece Agnes FitzGibbon (née Moodie, daughter of her sister Susanna) to produce a set of illustrations to go in the book. Agnes, a trained artist, agreed in part because she had recently lost her own husband and was hoping it might provide a means of support for herself and her six children, found a potential publisher, taught herself lithography, and serially produced each of the ten plates on a single borrowed lithographer’s stone at a Toronto printer. The publisher, John Lovell of Montreal, agreed to publish the book, provided Catharine and Agnes found 500 subscribers to the book at $5 apiece “which at that time was enough to buy a substantial piece of furniture” (Globe, 2015). By June 1867, 400 subscribers had been recruited and the publication began of “Canadian Wild Flowers”. Agnes, her daughters, and several artists from a local Toronto art school, hand painted each of the 5000 illustrations for the book (10 colour plates in each times 500 copies of the book) and Catharine was given $50 for her part in writing the book (again, a substantial amount then). “Canadian Wild Flowers set the standard for sumptuous nineteenth-century Canadian books. An early example of large-format home-produced colour illustration, it was one of the first serious botanical works published in the country” (Globe, 2015). In 1894, biologist James Fletcher, who established the National Herbarium of Canada on the Central Experimental Farm, justly praised Traill’s plant descriptions, despite her classification as an amateur botanist, as “one of the greatest botanical triumphs which [anyone] could achieve” (Peterman, 2003).

Catharine died in 1899 at the age of 97 and was writing until the end, and “at her death she was said to be the oldest living authoress in the British Dominion” (Morgan, 1903). Despite all the hardships she experienced, she was fondly remembered: “John Reade, speaking of Mrs. Traill [...] says: ‘No one knew her who did not love her. Those who knew nothing of her literary fame, loved her for her Christian love and charity. All children loved her. It was not uncommon for grey-haired men and women to say: “I have known and loved her all my life.” Her one boast (if boast it could be called), was: “I have never lost a friend.”’” (Morgan, 1903).

And the very useful references are here... )

The following is a photo of the Catherine Parr Traill section of the “HERbarium” exhibit. The print at the top right is of an herbarium specimen, a Cinnamon Fern from the massive Vascular Plant Collection of the Canadian Museum of Nature, which was collected by Catherine in 1897 (when she was 94 years old) and showed that she was actively pursuing botanical research (it is properly preserved and labelled with its scientific name and collection place, etc.) until she died in 1899. Click on the photo to open the full sized image in another tab.

pheloniusfriar: (Default)
If you're in the Ottawa area, come meet with me and the other co-curators of this amazing exhibit that showcases the world-class work done by early women scientists in Canada. The careers of the five featured women spans almost 200 years, from the early 1800s to the 1970s, and many of the artifacts are unique and on public display for the first time. If you can't make it out on October 17, then you can still see the exhibit at the Carleton University Art Gallery any time before it closes December 3, 2017.

Tuesday, 17 October, 7:00 p.m.

Please join us for a tour of HERbarium, an exhibition that sheds light on several women who made formative contributions to the field of botany in Canada, including renowned Ottawa mycologists Mildred Nobles and Irene Mounce.

HERbarium was co-curated by students enrolled in "Representations of Women's Scientific Contributions," a women's and gender studies seminar taught last winter by Dr. Cindy Stelmackowich.

The students, from such departments as chemistry, physics, art history, and women's and gender studies, worked collaboratively and across disciplines to produce HERbarium.

ADMISSION is free and everyone is welcome! CUAG is an accessible space, with barrier-free washrooms and elevator.

PARKING We'll sell discount parking passes ($4.00 flat rate) at the tunnel entrance from 6:40 to 7:10 p.m.. Details are at this link: http://www.cuag.ca/index.php/visiting/directions



Image: Cinnamon Fern specimen collected by Catharine Parr Traill, from the Canadian Museum of Nature's collection

This...

Sep. 24th, 2017 05:08 am
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
Twitter user @astrokatey (Katey Alatalo) just posted this in 22 parts, which I will present in bullet form here. I have heard these sorts of stories from fellow students (as a student) and from professional scientists (as a radio inteviewer). Science (and STEM in general) is supposed to be a meritocracy, and it does best when it is, but it is also a human endeavour and wrought with all the failings and successes of all human activities. As soon as privileged thinking enters the picture, the quality of the science goes down because those with privilege know they don't have to try as hard to get the same recognition of their work or careers. It just so happens that most of those with privilege are white and male (and often in the latter part of their careers). It is hard to make space for others not exactly like ourselves, but that is (imho) one of the defining aspects of civilization and civil society.
  • This article (NYT "Push for Gender Equality in Tech? Some Men Say It’s Gone Too Far") has made me super angry. Do you want to know what it is like trying to be a woman in a scientific space? Let me tell you.
  • Your teachers will start telling you when you are young that you are “not ready” for advanced math.
  • I was just lucky my mother stood up for me with that teacher. Otherwise I would not have been in calculus in high school.
  • In college, you will be in classes where your male classmates will tell you how easy the homework was. You’ll doubt yourself a lot.
  • Only to find out they were scoring Cs while you were getting As. Be ready for them to also say things like “women aren’t naturally scientists”.
  • Those same men will look at you like a possible person to date, when you just want to do your work. You learn to close yourself off.
  • Then, if you’re lucky, the president of Harvard will give a speech about women being biologically inferior in science.
  • And you’ll get to listen to your peers repeating that all around you. You get into top grad schools, are told it’s because you’re a woman.
  • You go. Then your advisor makes you uncomfortable by staring at your chest [she linked to this article: "How Sexual Harassment Halts Science"].
  • You make it clear they made you uncomfortable. So they isolate you, insult you, and try to drive out of science.
  • When it is too much, you report it to the chair. Who tells you that you are overreacting, or lying. And threatens to throw you out.
  • You put your head down and try hard as you can not to “rock the boat” after the chair did you the “favor” of letting you switch advisors.
  • The stress of merely surviving saps you of the creative energy you needed to write and advance academically.
  • AND that ex-advisor is using his platform to denigrate you and your science.
  • MIRACULOUSLY you make it out. You graduate, you get your Ph.D. and you get a postdoc.
  • You work your BUTT off to catch up to peers. Build the networks your advisor usually helps you build and manage to get good science done.
  • YOU DID IT! You got a fellowship!! You talk about your struggles. Many don’t believe you.
  • Every day, articles like the one in the New York Times come out to remind you your voice matters less than a spoiled white boy’s.
  • And those classmates and those harassers come back to your mind. And you wonder…
  • Was the cost of having the audacity to want to be an astronomer while also being a woman worth it?
  • Most women in science I know share some of my narrative. Do most men? No. They were assumed from kids to be sciencey.
  • When the day comes that vast majority of science women DO NOT have a tale like mine, then, New York Times, we can talk “biology”.

It is the two lines "the stress of merely surviving saps you of the creative energy you needed to write and advance academically" and "you work your butt off to catch up to peers and build the networks your advisor usually helps you build and manage to get good science done" that, to me, highlight why action needs to be taken to address sexism (and racism, and classism, and ableism, and...) in the sciences. Societies have huge problems with discrimination and building those walls doesn't protect it, it makes it weaker and has a huge opportunity cost (imagine if all of those people that are interested and good at things were the ones given the opportunities instead of those who are meh about the whole thing but do it because it's easy because they are privileged... that is lost opportunity for all of us). This is also why professional organizations need to up their game when it comes to taking active measures to reverse the historic inequities that exist in their respective fields: the way the system work is that no matter how well someone does in their formative years, if they are part of a marginalized group they were not permitted to do as much as their privileged peers (I am, at the moment, quite frustrated with the Canadian Association of Physicists... they are doing a poor job at addressing the institutionalized discrimination in the field of physics in Canada). Again, we are all poorer for it. If we can't get this to work in the sciences (remember? supposed meritocracy?), then what chance do we have of sorting this out in society as a whole?

pheloniusfriar: (Default)
Our new head of state in Canada is a female astronaut... how frickin' cool is that!?!!!

Former astronaut Julie Payette to be Canada's next governor general

She is also a computer engineer with a commercial pilot licence, and is also an accomplished athlete, pianist, and choral singer.
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
Received in the past hour...

Dear Phelonius:

Congratulations! I am pleased to welcome you to the Bachelor of Arts Honours Women's and Gender Studies program at Carleton University. Enclosed are details regarding your offer of admission...


As stated before, I have completed all the requirements to graduate (they included an audit confirming it... the requirements change year over year, so it was possible that I could have gotten caught by something I didn't know about, but I'm good). So... as soon as I have graduated from my B.Sc. Honours program (I was told it would be around the end of May sometime, possibly early June), I can apply to graduate with the B.A. Honours (I already know my final grade as well, it's an A- ... not stellar, but pretty amazing for a degree I had not intended to get when I went to university, and much better than my final grade for physics, ugh). The convocation will be in the fall some time I believe. If you're in Ottawa on June 13, you are cordially invited to an apres-graduation soirée at my place in the evening (if you don't know the coordinates, message me).

In celebration, I present one of my favourite videos (it always makes me smile... and shake my head a little at it as I watch):



Never a dull moment!
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
I just got my grade for the last class I had to take (4th year quantum mechanics), and I passed. I did not get the mark I was hoping for, but moving on to a new phase of my life is much more important (it has been so many years of being stressed out of my mind 24/7/365.25, it is going to take me a while to decompress). As such, I will be graduating in June (well, officially before then I presume, but ceremonially in June). I will have a B.Sc. Honours in Theoretical Physics with a Minor in Mathematics. As soon as I get the official word that I have graduated (it is pending now and needs to be approved by the university Senate, along with approvals for everyone else graduating), I will be applying for admission to the B.A. Honours Women's and Gender Studies programme. Having completed all of the requirements for that programme already, as soon as I'm accepted (presuming, of course), I will be applying to graduate from that as well (it will be a fall convocation for that).

Anyone in the Ottawa area is cordially invited to a party at my place the evening of Tuesday June 13th, which is the day of my convocation. I will hold a post-graduation party as well within a couple of weeks of that (probably the weekend of the 24th) for those who can't make it out on a weekday night. Just private message me if you don't know the way... Note: if you ask me for the way to San Jose, then that song will be stuck in my head, and I will hate you ;).
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
Just emailed...

The Honourable Ahmed D. Hussen,

Given the deplorable behaviour of the government of the United States of America with regards to the targeting of those with Muslim religious, ethnic, or national ties, and the unconsionable rejection of refugees (many of whom can trace their plight to actions on the part of the United States), it would seem prudent in both the short and long term at this point in time to immediately repeal the Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement. The situation to the south of the border is just going to get worse and if Canada is truly committed to mitigating the terrible situations that refugees find themselves in, especially now that they are being abandoned or even demonized by such a major world power as the United States, we must be proactive in sending a message that there are still humanitarian countries left in the world that are concerned with the ongoing refugee crises happening in so many places.

As many have said since the executive order was signed, the basic premises that the Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement was signed under have been substantively undermined, and it now presents a grave risk to refugees and exposes Canada to potentially unwelcome scrutiny if it fails to take timely action. I, and others, recognize that the government in Canada must be cautious in its actions such that they not be viewed as directly attacking the administration in Washington, D.C.; however, for Canada to accept refugees rejected by the United States for ideological and political reasons (and who are in danger of having their rights trampled because of their religion, ethnicity, or country of birth or origin), would send a signal to the citizens of the US, Canada, and the world that (strongly) oppose this latest turn of events that there are international repercussions to such small-minded, mean-spirited, and potentially deadly policies against the most vulnerable populations in the world. While we cannot count on rational behaviour from the leaders of our largest trading partner, we can at least make the right choices in those areas where we have some autonomy and disentagle ourselves from the dangerous course being set by the US administration. Repeal the Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement now.

Yours sincerely,

Phelonius Friar
Ottawa, Ontario

cc: The Honourable Maryam Monsef, Minister responsible for the Status of Women (since the executive order will disproportionately affect women all over the world), and The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau (because he is the face of the Canadian government and is talking the talk, but Canadians and people all over the world need to see him walking the walk too).
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
As part of my ongoing series of quixotic letters to those in power, I present the following.

The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau,

With regard to the sale of Canadian armaments to the Saudi Arabian regime, I think the Liberal government has failed an important test of whether they are fundamentally different from the previous (and globally reviled) government here in Canada. Whether or not the weapons and weapon systems Canada is selling to the Saudis are going to be used in the direct oppression and murder of civilian populations, it will assist in justifying their continued brutal practices through the legitimacy that comes with the sale of such equipment to them by a nation such as Canada. I have been following with great interest the talk around betterment of the environment in Canada for aboriginal peoples and other potentially positive directions being contemplated, but this foreign policy decision is such a catastrophic failure to act in an ethical and moral manner, my hope for any real change in the governance of this country just evaporated.

One week ago, I finished the requirements for my B.A. Honours in Women's and Gender Studies degree (or Feminist Studies as I like to say) and have a year left at university to complete my B.Sc. Honours in Theoretical Physics as well before going into graduate studies (on top of a successful 25 year career in the international high technology field)... I have seen a few things in my life and like to think I have a fairly clear perspective of "the big picture". While you may call yourself a feminist, and have shown strong indication that you support a feminist agenda in some particular cases, the decision to sell weaponry to the Saudi Arabian government is a decidedly anti-feminist decision as their indiscriminate targeting of civilians in Yemen demonstrates (we hope it is indiscriminate, perhaps it is discriminate and deliberate as part of a campaign of terror, which would be in keeping with their general behaviour). I know you are aware that modern feminism is all about identifying and undermining those power structures that disproportionately oppress women, and I appreciate that you are at least not actively campaigning against the notion of feminisms like so many do. However, here was a golden opportunity to take a huge step to disrupt just such a collection of power relationships (and one of the most repressive in the world), but Canada has chosen to side with oppression and take a huge payoff from those oppressors to turn a blind eye, and that is simply the wrong thing to have done.

I would like to close with a quote by Albert Einstein – often misquoted but the idea tends to be accurate even then – that seems particularly appropos to me in this case. It was spoken by him in tribute to Pablo Cassals in 1953, "What I particularly admire in him is the firm stand he has taken, not only against the oppressors of his countrymen, but also against those opportunists who are always ready to compromise with the Devil. He perceives very clearly that the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it." I think that quote should be on plaques on the doors to both The House of Common and The Senate (and maybe in every bathroom stall and on the tables in the parliamentary cafeteria, but that could be seen as somewhat extreme I suppose) as a caution to consider when making government decisions.

Yours sincerely,

Phelonius Friar
A Canadian citizen

If nothing else, I guess I am at least sincere... I do wish I had been more careful not to conflate Trudeau's purported feminism with the policies of the Liberal government or Canada, and I know he said it would be government by cabinet (which I think is generally a good thing), but this part of the portfolio – the optics of what this country does – seems to have fallen to Trudeau, and this is bad optics that greatly diminishes anything he says in the future regarding human rights in general and feminism in particular.
pheloniusfriar: (Default)
Three quick (ya, I know, I'm not into posting short messages) updates:

Most pressing is that yesterday me and a good friend finally launched a Kickstarter campaign. Check it out, and if you think it's a good idea and have the means, please consider supporting it: "The 2016 Reboot of a Legendary Interactive Drama and the Inception of a New Media Genre"!

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/673299016/midnight-stranger

Also, I'm one step closer to being published as a physicist in a peer-reviewed journal (Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research)... the accepted pre-press manuscript has been made available. I'm not sure what issue it will be finally published in (it needs to go through the final editing and production phases), but you can bet I'll post when it happens :). Anyway, here's the link for that (it'll be there forever, so if you only have 5 minute, go poke your nose at the Kickstarter instead):

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900216001285

Finally, the new format for my radio show is finally starting to become workable for me. In case this is news, the show is an hour of feminism, science, and music (after 5 years I got good at the music part and don't want to give it up now). Yesterday I did my first interview: a Master's student in Women's and Gender Studies who is going to do their thesis on Batgirl from the comics (Barbara Gordon, and Oracle, and the controversies surrounding her on again/off again status as a person with disabilities and the tropes that surround it). I'll be trying to alternate between interviewing on science and feminism/social issues topics. The particular show is here (available "on demand" 24/7 for the next year or so):

http://cod.ckcufm.com/programs/371/25764.html

The general show link is here, again it's available to listen to "on demand": The Passionate Friar...

Profile

pheloniusfriar: (Default)
pheloniusfriar

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678 910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 23rd, 2025 03:35 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios